Implications of Copyright Issues: An Analysis of Invention by Human and Artificial Intelligence
Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, copyright laws, human inventions, original workAbstract
Evolution in the world has led to a wide spread of technological advancements. One example is artificial intelligence (AI). Machine intelligence is the intelligence produced by machines. It is the concept which begins the moment, when the machines are able to accomplish the tasks in lieu of human intelligence. The Artificial Intelligence is getting more efficient and is able to complete more task in lieu of Human Intelligence. The recent debate to recognise ChatGPT as an author is one of the recent controversies, where in some journals have given recognition and considered ChatGPT as an author, whereas many have not. Artificial Intelligence bots like ChatGPT have endangered careers of various professionals including academicians, content writers, lawyers and software engineers, etc. It is becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish between AI and human-created content. The concept to
give AI status of a creator is still questionable and unfamiliar. There are no existing laws to specifically protect creations made from AI as original works. Intellectual property rights (IPR) are rights given to persons over the creations of original works of authors which are artistic, literary, technical, or scientific work in the fields of patent, copyrights, trademark and so on. Copyright law is a form of intellectual property which gives protection in terms of authorship to a person who has created original work. Artificial intelligence is the intelligence produced by machines, and it does not mention this authorship to anyone other than a human. The distinction between AI and human-created content is becoming increasingly difficult. Validity of a copyright work lasts for 60 years for an author after his or her death in India. WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) has also created a forum under the WIPO Conversation on IP and AI to discuss the impact of AI on IP. The researcher will theoretically analyse the origin of artificial intelligence and its relation with the copyright laws. The law does not clearly define if an original work is created by AI without human intervention, then who will be considered the copyright owner? Also, what will happen if a person plagiaries or infringes another’s original work of AI then who will be punished, either the coder/creator of Artificial Intelligence or the buyer of the creation. This study is to review the existing provisions and seek answers to these questions through theoretical research. With this study, the researcher seeks to analyse technological advancements and growing usage of Artificial Intelligence and its interface with exiting Copyright Laws.
References
Chloe Olewitz. (2016 Mar 23). A Japanese AI Program Just Wrote a Short Novel, and it Almost Won a Literary Prize. [Online]. Digital Trends. <https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool- tech/ Japanese-ai-writes-novel-passes-first-round-national- literary-prize/> accessed 1 October 2018.
Stephen Chen. (2017 Jun 6). Roses are Red, Violets are Blue; Does AI Poetry Do it for You? [Online]. South China Morning Post (Hong Kong). <https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/ article/2097044/ microsofts-ai-bot-has-published-book-poems-china-it-worth- reading> accessed 1 October 2018.
McKendrick J. (2022 Dec 21). Who Ultimately Owns Content Generated by ChatGPT and Other AI Platforms? [Online]. Forbes. (https://www.forbes.com/sites/joemckendrick/2022/12/21/who-ultimately-owns-content-generated-by-chatgpt-and-other-ai-platforms/) date accessed on: 19 February 2023
Kung TH, et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-Assisted Medical Education Using Large Language Models. Preprint at medRxiv. 2022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.19.22283643. date accessed on: 21 February 2023 5. O’Connor S. ChatGPT. Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse? Nurse Educ Pract. 2023; 66: 103537. Date accessed on: 21 February 2023
Arbesu I, Bucsaiova M, Fischer MB, Mannhalter C. Platelet‐borne complement proteins and their role in platelet–bacteria interactions. J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Nov; 14(11): 2241–52. [Internet]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27590476/ [cited 2023 Mar 2]
George F Luger. Structures and Strategies for Complex Problem Solving [Internet]. Available from: http://www.uoitc.edu.iq/images/documents/informatics-institute/Competitive_exam/Artificial_ Intelligence.pdf.
Destiny Robotics. (2022 Jan 15). 5 Most Famous Humanoid Robots. [Online]. My Site. Retrieved February 21, 2023, from https://www.destinyrobotics.io/post/5-most-famous-humanoid-robots
Javatpoint. History of Artificial Intelligence. [Online]. www.javatpoint.com. Retrieved February 21, 2023, from https://www.javatpoint.com/history-of-artificial-intelligence
Monika Shailesh. (2018 Oct 10). Artificial Intelligence: Facets & Its Tussle with IPR. [Online]. New Technology - India. Retrieved November 29, 2022, from. https://www.mondaq.com/india/ new-technology/740638/artificial-intelligence-facets-its-tussle-with-ipr
Andrew Myers. (2011 Oct 25). Stanford’s John McCarthy, seminal figure of artificial intelligence, dies at 84. [Online]. Stanford University. Retrieved November 29, 2022, from http://news.stanford.edu/news/2011/october/john-mccarthy-obit-102511.html
Karin Kelley. (2023 Mar 9). What is Artificial Intelligence: Types, History, and Future. 2022 Edition. [Online]. Simplilearn. Retrieved November 29, 2022, from https://www.simplilearn.com/ tutorials/artificial-intelligence-tutorial/what-is-artificial-intelligence
Nilsson Nils J. The Quest for Artificial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
Gartner. Definition of Artificial Intelligence (Al) - information technology glossary. [Online]. Gartner. https:/lwww.gartner.com/enlinformation-technologylglossarylartificial-intelligence (last visited Nov 25, 2021).
Definition of artificial intelligence. (2023 Feb 17). Artificial intelligence Definition & Meaning. [Online]. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved from: https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/ artificial+intelligence. Retrieved February 21, 2023,
Artificial intelligence and IPR, Legal Service India. Law, Lawyers and Legal Resources. [Online]. https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-2867-artificial-intelligence-and-ipr.html. Date Accessed on December 5, 2022
Copyright Office. Chapter 11: Subject matter and scope of copyright. [Online]. Circular 92I U.S. Copyright Office. https://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html Id. visited Nov 25' 2021)
Sarthak Dogra. (2022 Feb 22). AI Cannot Copyright Its Art, US Copyright Office Says Human Authorship Necessary for Patent. [Online]. India Today. Available at: https://www.indiatoday.in/ technology/news/story/ai-cannot-copyright-its-art-us-copyright-office-says-human-authorship-necessary-for-patent-1916317-2022-02-22 Retrieved on February 21, 2023
legislation.gov.uk. Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. [Online]. Retrieved December 5, 2022, from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/section/9
Jonathan Binns. (2022 Dec 20). The Impact of AI on Copyright Law. [Online]. Legal Cheek. Retrieved February 21, 2023, from https://www.legalcheek.com/lc-journal-posts/the-impact-of-ai-on-copyright-law/
Korean Copyright Commission. (2022). Copyright law > Laws & Treaties > Home. [Online]. Retrieved December 5, 2022, from https://www.copyright.or.kr/eng/laws-and-treaties/copyright-law/act.do
Dentons. (2022, April 11). Copyright and AI: the Korean View. [Online]. Retrieved December 5, 2022, from https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/articles/2022/april/11/copyright-and-ai-the-korean-view
Naruto v. Slater, No. 16-15469 (9th Cir. 2018).
Zaletel v. Prisma Labs, Inc., No. 16-1307-SLR, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30868 (D. Del. Mar. 6, 2017).
Sevatec, Inc. v. Ayyar, 102 Va. Cir. 148 (Va. Cir. Ct.) 2019.
Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony - 111 U.S. 53, 4 S. Ct. 279 (1884).
Aerotek, Inc. v. Boyd, 598 S.W.3d 373 (Tex. App. 2020).
Alfred Bell & Co. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc. - 191 F.2d 99 (2d Cir. 1951).
Julia Bossmann. (2016 Oct 21). Top 9 Ethical Issues in Artificial Intelligence. [Online]. World Economic Forum. Retrieved February 22, 2023, from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/10/ top-10-ethical-issues-in-artificial-intelligence/
WIPO conversation on intellectual property (IP) and frontier technologies [Online]. 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 10]. Available from: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/en/wipo_ip_conv_ ge_2_22/wipo_ip_conv_ge_2_22_inf_2_prov.pdf



