Legal Enforceability of Environmental Impact Assessment in Climate-Vulnerable Zones

Authors

  • Poulami Sengupta
  • Sonali Rakshit

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37591/njel.v9i2.2177

Keywords:

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), Climate Change, Climate Justice, Sustainable Development.

Abstract

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a tool to prevent environmental problems. It supports decision makers in exploring what could happen to the environment if they implement their plans. This is particularly useful for at risk areas from climate change such as coasts, floodplains and small islands, already experiencing impacts such as sea level rise, extreme rainfall and drought. Although Environmental Impact Assessment is mandated by law in many countries and assuming increasing importance in international law, however, there remains a considerable distance between what is required by law and what actually happens, the article examines the role of Environmental Impact Assessment in addressing climate change. The article examines the legal framework existing in various jurisdictions. The article also examines circumstantial and enabling factors which hinder enforcement of the law. The article discusses relevant judicial decisions. The article says that Environmental Impact Assessment is essential to protect the environment and to support by communities that are most vulnerable. The article says that Environmental Impact Assessment must be robust and effective and that this depends on having laws and regulations as well as institutions that can enforce the laws. It also depends on public participation and on having systems to monitor and remedy. Environmental law via Environmental Impact Assessment can be a tool to protect people and the environment. The article draws on information from a variety of sources, including laws, court cases and studies from countries such as India, the European Union and the United States. It concerns itself with the application of Environmental Impact Assessment to preclude environmental problems and further climate justice through policy implementation in the countries most vulnerable to climate change. Environmental Impact Assessment is of fundamental importance for climate resilience and the achievement of sustainable development goals To ensure that Environmental Impact Assessment works, we need to establish rules and have institutions, public participation and monitoring. The first purpose of Environmental Impact Assessment is to protect the environment and promote climate justice. Environmental Impact Assessment is a tool, to protect the most vulnerable communities and ecosystems and must be used in a fair and effective way.

References

1. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321–4370h (1970).

2. Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (Act 29 of 1986).

3. Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006, S.O. 1533(E), dated Sept. 14, 2006 (as amended).

4. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321–4370h (1970).

5. European Commission, Guidance on Integrating Climate Change and Biodiversity into Environmental Impact Assessment (Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg).

6. Rose Mayembe, Nicholas Philip Simpson, Olivia Rumble & Marieke Norton, Integrating Climate Change in Environmental Impact Assessment: A Review of Requirements Across 19 EIA Regimes, 869 Science of The Total Environment 161850 (2023).

7. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Notification No. S.O. 1533(E), dated Sept. 14, 2006.

8. EIA Notification, 2006, supra note 3.

9. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969

10. Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Directive 2014/52/EU of 16 April 2014, 2011 O.J. (L 26) 1.

11. Rose Mayembe et al., Integrating Climate Change in Environmental Impact Assessment: A Review of Requirements Across 19 EIA Regimes, 869 Science of The Total Environment 161850 (2023).

12. generally Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change, Advisory Opinion, 2025 I.C.J. Rep. ___ (July 23)

13. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Principle 17, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I) (12 August 1992).

14. Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, Feb. 25, 1991, 1989 U.N.T.S. 309; Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, May 21, 2003, 2685 U.N.T.S. 140.

15. Convention on Biological Diversity, 5 June 1992, 1760 U.N.T.S. 79; CBD Conference of the Parties decisions and voluntary guidelines on biodiversity-inclusive impact assessment (including Decision VIII/28).

16. OECD, Capacity Development for Climate Change in Small Island Developing States (2023); UNCTAD and UNDESA assessments on SIDS governance and capacity vulnerabilities.

17. The Constitution of India, arts. 14 and 21.

18. Common Cause v. Union of India (2017) 9 SCC 499.

19. Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Rohit Prajapati (2020) 17 SCC 157.

20. Center for Biological Diversity v. Bernhardt, 982 F.3d 723 (9th Cir. 2020).

21. M.K. Ranjitsinh v. Union of India, 2024 INSC 280 (21 March 2024). Vanashakti v. Union of India (May 2025) and subsequent review proceedings culminating in the 2026 clarification of residual statutory power under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (2026 INSC 761 and related orders).

22. Sierra Club v. FERC, 867 F.3d 1357 (D.C. Cir. 2017).

23. Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland, Application no. 53600/20, Grand Chamber, European Court of Human Rights, Judgment of 9 April 2024.

24. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, Integrating Climate Considerations into Environmental Impact Assessments (London School of Economics and Political Science, 2026).

25. generally comparative reviews noting late-stage integration of climate considerations, underdeveloped cumulative climate assessment, and lagging progress at the strategic level.

26. M.K. Ranjitsinh v. Union of India, 2024 INSC 280; Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland, Application No. 53600/20, ECtHR (Grand Chamber) (Apr. 9, 2024).

Published

2026-08-30