ETHICAL OBLIGATIONS OF ADVOCATES AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE: AN ANALYSIS OF LAW AND PRACTICE IN INDIA
Keywords:
legal profession, professional ethics, sustainable development, goals, access to justice, rule of lawAbstract
Legal profession is a noble profession which not only upholds the rule of law in society but also plays a crucial role in facilitating justice thus promoting sustainable development goal. The integrity of the legal profession is the fundamental requirement for a just society which enables social and economic development of a nation. This integrity in the profession is ensured by robust ethical standards. Advocates, as officers of the court, are bound by ethical obligations that extend beyond client representation to include duties toward courts, the profession, third parties and society. This paper presents a doctrinal and analytical study of the professional ethics of advocates, with primary reference to the Advocates Act, 1961 and the Bar Council of India Rules, supplemented by judicial interpretations.
The study critically examines the growing dissonance between practical enforcement of these ethical standards in contemporary legal practice and their codified versions. It identifies key challenges such as marketability of advocacy, conflicts of interest especially in digital era and social media along with the increasing systemic weaknesses in disciplinary control mechanisms. Through an analysis of selected judicial pronouncements and disciplinary proceedings, the paper evaluates the effectiveness of existing regulatory frameworks governing the conduct of advocates.
The findings of this paper indicate that the persistence of ethical violations is closely linked to inadequate enforcement, procedural delays in disciplinary actions, and limited emphasis on ethical training. The paper argues that strengthening professional ethics requires a multi-dimensional approach encompassing regulatory reform, continuous professional education, and enhanced institutional accountability. The study concludes that reinforcing ethical compliance among advocates is essential for restoring public trust in the judicial process and legal profession for ensuring effective administration of justice.
References
C.S. Andrews, The Law: A Business or a Profession?, 17 YALE L.J. 602 (1908).
M.P. Singh, Securing the Independence of the Judiciary—The Indian Experience, 10 IND. INT’L & COMP. L. REV. 245 (2000).
Adversarial System: A legal system where the role of the court is primarily that of an impartial referee between the prosecution and the defense. Both sides are responsible for presenting their evidence and arguments, and the judge or jury determines the truth based on the presentation: Adversarial vs. Inquisitorial Legal Systems: Unravelling the Key Differences,4LEGAL ENGLISH
Right to legal representation in India is both a constitutional right (Article 22(1)) and a statutory right (Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961, and under sections 38- Right to Counsel During Interrogation ,340- Right to Legal Aid at State Expense and 341- Right to be Defended of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita).
Hussainara Khatoon v Home Secretary State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 98, and MH Hoskot v State of Maharashtra (1978) 3 SCC 544.
131st Law Commission report.
The concept of Rule of law is of old origin and is an ancient ideal. It was discussed by ancient Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle around 350 BC. Later, Sir Edward Coke, the Chief Justice of King James I’s reign originated this concept. He maintained that the King should be under God and the Law and he established the supremacy of the law against the executive and that there is nothing higher than law.
Sections 29, 30, and 33, only advocates enrolled with a State Bar Council have the exclusive right to practice law throughout India.
Section 29 Advocates Acts, 1961- Advocates to be the only recognised class of persons entitled to practise law. ―Subject to the provisions of this Act and any rules made thereunder, there shall, as from the appointed day, be only one class of persons entitled to practise the profession of law, namely, advocates.
Section 30 Advocates Acts, 1961- Right of advocates to practise.―Subject to the provisions of this Act, every advocate whose name is entered in the [State roll] shall be entitled as of right to practise throughout the territories to which this Act extends,― (i) in all courts including the Supreme Court; (ii) before any tribunal or person legally authorised to take evidence; and (iii) before any other authority or person before whom such advocate is by or under any law for the time being in force entitled to practise.
Section 33 Advocates Acts, 1961- Advocates alone entitled to practise. ―Except as otherwise provided in this Act or in any other law for the time being in force, no person shall, on or after the appointed day, be entitled to practise in any court or before any authority or person unless he is enrolled as an advocate under this Act.
Section 132 of the Bhartiya Sakhsya Adhiniyam, 2023 (“BSA”) prohibits advocates from disclosing any of their communication with their clients, (including any advice tendered) during the course of and for the purpose of their professional service as advocates. ,
Section 33 Advocates Act,1961, ibid
The Bar Council of India (BCI) Rules under Chapter II, Part VI of the BCI Rules, strictly govern the duties of an advocate
Relation of utmost trust and good faith.
“Confidence in judicial system on decline in people’s perception”: Kapil Sibal, The Hindu, March 23, 2025; "Public faith in judiciary gets denuded by corruption among judges": CJI B R Gavai, Times of India, June 5 2025.
Santosh Barar @ Raju VS State of M. P. - 2018 Supreme (MP) 491
Prahlad Saran Gupta V Bar council of India AIR 1997 SC 1338
Same counsel/s appearing for two opposing parties: Mary Lilian Hira Devi v. Digbijai Singh, Chandra Shekhar Soni v. Bar Council of Rajasthan and Others AIR 1983 SC 1012
Hikmat Ali Khan v Ishwar Prasad Arya, UP Sales Tax Service Association v Taxation Bar Association, Agra
The India Justice Report 2025 by The Hindu, is a first of its kind national periodic reporting that ranks the capacity of states to deliver justice. The report underscores India's aspirations and challenges in ensuring accessible, efficient, and inclusive justice. Despite the implementation of digital tools and reforms, fundamental capacity gaps persist. A comprehensive, sustained, and accountable approach is crucial to transforming justice delivery across the country.
Lecture regarding professional Ethics at ILI by R. Venkataramani, Senior Advocate Supreme Court of India.
Section 165. Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 Production of documents:
(1) A witness summoned to produce a document shall, if it is in his possession or power, bring it to Court, notwithstanding any objection which there may be to its production or to its admissibility:
Provided that the validity of any such objection shall be decided on by the Court.
(2) The Court, if it sees fit, may inspect the document, unless it refers to matters of State, or take other evidence to enable it to determine on its admissibility
(3) If for such a purpose it is necessary to cause any document to be translated, the Court may, if it thinks fit, direct the translator to keep the contents secret, unless the document is to be given in evidence and, if the interpreter disobeys such direction, he shall be held to have committed an offence under section 198 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023:
Provided that no Court shall require any communication between the Ministers and the President of India to be produced before it.
Cornell Law School (Wex Legal Dictionary)
The book “Seven Lamps of Advocacy" by Judge Edward Abbott Parry delves into the essential qualities like, honesty, courage, industry, wit, eloquence, judgment, and fellowship that make a great advocate.
Chapter IV sections 29-34 of the advocates act, supra note 8 at page 3
Work ethics is defined as a set of attitudes concerned with the value of work, which forms the motivational orientation. The ‘work ethics’ is aimed at ensuring the economy (get job, create wealth, earn salary), productivity (wealth, profit), safety (in workplace), health and hygiene (working conditions), privacy (raise family), security (permanence against contractual, pension, and retirement benefits), cultural and social development (leisure, hobby, and happiness), welfare (social work), environment (anti-pollution activities), and offer opportunities for all, according to their abilities, but without discrimination. From the book ‘Professional Ethics and Human Values’ by R.S. Naagarazan, New Age International (P) Ltd., publishers, New Delhi, 2006.
Noratanmal Chouraria vs M.R. Murli & Anr (2004) 5 SCC 689: case determined that an advocate can be held liable for professional misconduct under the Advocates Act, 1961 even if the misconduct occurs while acting as a litigant-in-person, rather than as a practicing advocate.
Section 35 – Provides for punishment of advocates for professional misconduct (basis for enforcing duties).
Section 36 & 36B – Disciplinary powers of Bar Council of India.
Section 49(1)(c) – Empowers BCI to frame rules on standards of professional conduct and etiquette.
Bar Council of India Rules (Chapter II, Part VI)
Supreme Court Rules, 2013, Order IV Rules 1-10 (Responsibilities of Advocate On Record)
D.P. Chadha v. Triyugi Narain Mishra (2001) 2 SCC 221
Ibid,
Ibid.
P.D. Khandekar v. Bar Council of Maharashtra AIR 1984 SC 110
R.D. Saxena v. Balram Prasad Sharma AIR 2000 SC 2912
Bar Council of Maharashtra v. M.V. Dabholkar (1975) 2 SCC 702
Shoe thrown at India's top judge (CJI) on religious row,7th October 2025, BBC New Delhi.
Bomb blast in Pakistan school, amendments to Sri Lanka’s Constitution, interstate river water disputes, attack on / murder of advocate, earthquake in Nepal, to condole the death of their near relatives, to show solidarity to advocates of other State Bar Associations, moral support to movements by social activists, heavy rains, or on some religious occasions such as shraadh, Agrasen Jayanti, etc. or even for kavi sammelan. Cited from 266th Law Commission Report, 2017
Unlawful advertisement, direct solicitation, misuse of professional symbols such as bands, and dissemination of misleading legal information establishes a clear pattern of gross professional misconduct.
August and October 2025, the Supreme Court of India issued strong advisories urging lawyers to refrain from providing detailed legal advice over telephone calls, WhatsApp, or other electronic, non-secure modes. The Court emphasized that for proper consultation, particularly in criminal or sensitive matters, clients should be invited to a lawyer’s office or chamber
As on October 23, 2024. The World Justice Project evaluates countries based on eight indicators:
Constraints On Government Powers,2. Absence of Corruption,3. Open Government,4. Fundamental Rights,
Order And Security,6. Regulatory Enforcement, 7. Civil Justice, and 8. Criminal Justice.
2025-26.
O.P. Sharma v. High Court of Punjab and Haryana, AIR 2011 SC 2101; Dr. D.C. Saxena v. Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, (1996) 5 SCC 216, 220.
Judge Bound to Hear Cases as Per Roster; Litigants Can't Engage in Forum Shopping: Kerala HC; Forum Shopping Is Abuse of Legal Process and Cannot Be Condoned: Delhi High Court. 'Forum Shopping Cannot Be Approved; A Ground to Refuse Relief’: Supreme Court Sets Aside Interim Bail.
In World Justice Project (WJP) India's judicial system ranks 79th out of 142 countries in the 2024 Rule of Law Index by the), with some reports indicating a further drop to 86th in 2025. While the Supreme Court is considered very powerful, the overall system faces challenges with a 102nd rank in fundamental rights protection and 82nd in criminal justice efficiency due to massive case backlogs and delays.
Bar Council of Maharashtra v. M.V. Dabholkar (1975) 2 SCC 702
Most states draw these rules from American Bar Association Model Rules of Professional Conduct.
Asia Law Poral on April 30, 2013
Since from 1958 in its 14th report till 266th report of 2017.
Formerly known as CPT (Common Proficiency Test) it is the first level of three tier examination conducted by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI).
It is the main entrance exams for undergraduate doctors conducted annually by National Testing Agency (NTA).
IPS (Indian Police Service) conducted by UPSC, SSC CPO for Sub-Inspector and SSC GD for constable.
Under regulation 4 (4.1) of Draft Regulation For Compulsory Rotatory Internship,2021 by National Medical Commission Undergraduate Medical Education Board A mandatory 12-month Compulsory Rotatory Medical Internship (CRMI) is required after passing the final MBBS exams (or NEET) to obtain permanent registration and practice medicine in India.
Live Law, Column:"Ethics And Moral Values In Legal Profession" by Justice S.Vaidyanathan, 16 May 2020
ORDER XVII, CPC 1908: Adjournment
Court may grant time and adjourn hearing. — [(1) The court may, if sufficient cause is shown, at any stage of the suit grant time to the parties or to any of them, and may from time to time adjourn the hearing of the suit for reasons to be recorded in writing:
Provided that no such adjournment shall be granted more than three time to a party during hearing of the suit.]
ORDER XVII CPC,1908 clause (2) proviso (a)
Supra note 44 page 9
