An Analytical Study on International Commercial andInvestment Arbitration
Keywords:
Commercial, Investment, Arbitration, Dispute Settlement, ConverselyAbstract
With an emphasis on their distinctions and uses, this article offers a thorough analysis of international commercial and investment arbitration. A popular technique for settling disagreements resulting from cross-border business dealings, particularly those involving contracts between companies in various nations, is international commercial arbitration. It offers both efficiency and flexibility, which is why arbitration clauses are commonly included in contracts. Conversely, disputes between foreign investors and host governments, often stemming from breaches of investment treaties, are typically settled through investment arbitration, also known as Investor–State Dispute Settlement. Investors can seek remedy through international tribunals and avoid national courts by using this type of arbitration. The article examines the legal foundations that regulate these procedures, such as public international law treaties for
investment arbitration and the New York Convention for commercial arbitration. The role of organizations, like the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes in facilitating these arbitrations, is also discussed.
References
1. Strong SI. An empirical analysis of legal reasoning: Comparing investment arbitration and international commercial arbitration. Emory Leg Stud Res Paper. 2024
2. Van Harten G. Arbitrator behaviour in asymmetrical adjudication: An empirical study of investment treaty arbitration. Osgoode Hall LJ. 2012;50:211.
3. Mistelis L. International arbitration-corporate attitudes and practices-12 perceptions tested: Myths, data and analysis research report. Am Rev Int Arbitr. 2004;15:525.
4. Janjua LR, Ahmed S, Singh B. Prospects and challenges of artificial intelligence in forest protection. Mach Learn Int Thing Fire Ecol. 2025;231–46.
5. Singh B, Arora MK, Lal S, Raghav A, Ahmad S. Capital gains and cost allocation: Tax challenges in Indian demergers. Nat J Real Est Law. 2025;8(1):1–5.
6. Ahmed S, Singh B. Gender equality in the workplace: A comparative analysis of maternity and parental leave laws. J Fam Adopt Law. 2025;8(1):22–6.
7. Awasthi S. Legal issues and challenges in the international commercial arbitration: A comparative study. Indian JL LegRes. 2021;3:1.
8. Siddiqui A, Siddiqui M. International arbitration: A meta-analysis of five decade research. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2021;8(03):2021. Drahozal CR. Arbitration by the numbers: the state of empirical research on international commercial arbitration. Arbitr Int. 2006;22(2):291–308.
