Geographical Indication and Missing Regulatory Framework on Post Registration Quality Control Measures
Keywords:
Geographical indication, Quality check, post registration, EU rulesAbstract
Geographical indicators (GI) serve to distinguish commodities that originate in a certain region and provide information about the goods' quality, reputation, and origin. Around 370 items are currently registered in India under the Geographical Indication of goods (Registration & Protection) Act, 1999; in which Karnataka is the state with highest GI tags among them. The only provision related to GI that seems to be prioritized in the Act is product registration, but the concept of post registration quality control procedure is missing and least addressed by the legislators. As per the section 59 of GI act talks about quality and warranty of the good, “Implied Warranty on Sale of geographically Indicated Goods”. Therefore, the seller has to maintain the quality of product to protect the consumer from
exploitation. As quality has connection with the standards and economy of the country. In Indian GI system, the quality check is only done by the autonomous body or association of the producers. In case of Darjeeling tea, the association of producers is Tea board. And this cannot fully ensure the quality of GI goods (Tea) as there are many sellers who are selling cheap or duplicate quality tea with the Darjeeling Tea GI tag. Hence, in India we should have some regulatory authority for the post quality check of all the GI registered goods. Likewise, in Europe, the GI laws are recognized as Sui genesis rights in which the quality of good is checked by the concerned authority before it gets supplied to the market. Regulation 1151/2012 is the law in EU that basically regulates the GI and this is only
applicable to the agricultural products. But for the quality check, this law is definitely beneficial because when the group that is applying for the registration of GI tag, has to go through one or more recognized body, which ensures the specification and quality claimed during registration before the good is supplied to the market. Then this working of certification bodies will be inspected by competent authorities who maintain the check and balance on the geographical indication mechanism. Therefore, Indian GI law is set to undergo modifications and additional procedures like EU to aim at ensuring post registration quality stability which will definitely protect the interest of consumers and boost the economy of the country.
References
Geographical Indication Goods Act, 1999.
The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Rules, 2002
Council and European Parliament Regulation (EU) 2023/2411.
Wadehra, B. L. Law Relating to Intellectual Property. India: University law Publishing Company Pvt. Limited, 2010.
Ahuja VK. Law Concerning Intellectual Property Rights Articles. Nagpur: Lexis Nexis; 2013.
Das Kasturi (Centre for WTO Studies). Socioeconomic Implications of Protecting Geographical Indication in India. SSRN E Journal. 2009 Aug.
Yogesh Pai, Tania Singla. "Vanity GIs": The Absence of a Regulatory Framework and India's Law on Geographical Indications. SSRN E Journal. 2016 Oct 20.
Geographical Indications Goods Rules, 1991.
Geographical Indications Goods Rules, 2002.
Kamatagi S. Geographical Indications in India and the Missing Regulatory Framework on Post Registration Quality Control Measures. International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis (IJLRA). 2022; 2(7): 1–16. https://www.ijlra.com/.
Geographical Indications Goods (Registration and Protection) Rules, 2002.
GI Act 11, GI Rules 23. Form GI-1, Application for the Registration of a Geographical Indication in Part A of the Register. [Online]. http://ipindia.nic.in/girindia/Form_GI1.pdf (last visited 8 March 2016).
Pai YP, Singla T. (2017 Jun 16). ‘Vanity GIs’: India’s Legislation on Geographical Indications and the Missing Regulatory Framework. [Online]. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316711002.015
The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI). (2013 Mar). The Protection of Geographical Indications in India: Issues and Challenges. [Online]. www.teriin.org/div/briefing_paper_GI.pdf.
Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Rules, 2002.
Geographical Indications Goods (Registration and Protection) Rules, 2002.
European Commission. (2013 Feb 18). Study on Geographical Indications Protection for Non-Agricultural Products in the Internal Market. [Online].
Johann Robert Basedow, Davide Bonvicini. The EU-US Trade Dispute on Geographical Indications: Two Scorpions in a Bottle? Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Working Paper.
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 April 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, 1869 U.N.T.S. 299, 33 I.L.M. 1197 (1994) art. 22(1).
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 April 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, 186.
9 U.N.T.S. 299, 33 I.L.M. 1197 (1994) art. 22(1).
Regulation (EU) No. 1151/2012, supra note 30; Irena Kireeva, European Legislation on Protection of Geographical Indications: Overview of the EU Member States’ Legal Framework for Protection of Geographical Indications, IPR2. (2011 Feb).
Schiavetti DF. (2022 Jul 13). Geographical Indications in the EU: A Step Forward in The Protection of Traditional Artisanal Skills. [Online]. Trademark - European Union. https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/trademark/1211222/geographical-indications-in-the-eu-a-step-forward-in-the-protection-of-traditional-artisanal-skills



