Environmental Protection and the Cameroonian Agricultural Policies: What Prospect for implementation
Keywords:
Agriculture, Cameroon, Environment, Policy degradation, Sustainable, agricultural practicesAbstract
Nourishing the world requires a heavy reliance on the environment. Such reliance leads to poor and unsustainable agricultural practices, such as “bushfire” and “slash and burn” farming methods, to synthetic fertilizers, synthetic organic pesticides, and overgrazing. With the constant increase in population, there is a steady loss of biodiversity caused by the population’s huge demand for food and other agricultural activities. This study critically analyzes and shows how unsustainable local and modern agricultural practices in Cameroon cause environmental degradation, which may lead to the destruction of forest cover, climate change, ozone depletion, species’ extinction and the like. These constitute the greatest environmental problems plaguing the humanity in the 21st century and felt mostly by local communities. The study attempts to examine the extent to which the legal frameworks governing agricultural practices in Cameroon have addressed the concern of environmental sustainability and shows that unsustainable agricultural practices are some of the proximate causes of environmental degradation in Cameroon. Through empirical and theoretical approaches to data collection, the study exposes the negative impacts of unsustainable local and modern agricultural practices on the environment. The study recommends the significant and timely involvement of local communities in the processes to address the concerns of environmental degradation.
References
1. Hunter, D. et al, International Environmental Law and Policy, Foundation Press, New York, 1998, P. 12.
2. Para 1 of the preamble of Stockholm Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 16 June 1972.
3. Para 2, ibid.
4. Principle 8 of Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 14 June 1992.
5. See article three of the 1996 fr amework law on environmental management.
6. Hunter, D. et al. Note 3, p. 5.
7. Larsson, M., «Sustainable Agriculture and Food Security in a Changing Climate: A Study with examples from Ethiopia», Church of Sweden, SK09174, P. 12.
8. Larsson, M., op. cit., P. 13.
9. Principle 8 of Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 14 June 1992.
10. Larsson, M., op. cit., P. 13.
11. World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
12. Principle 4 of Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 14 June 1992.
13. Principle 2 of Stockholm Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 16 June 1972. NJEL (2019) 1-21 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 18
14. Yengoh, G. T. et al., (2010), «Paths to Attaining Food Security: The Ca se of Cameroon», OPEN ACCESS, P. 18.
15. Principle 1 of Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 14 June 1992.
16. Principle 19 of Stockholm Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 16 June 1972
17. Principle 13 of Stockholm Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 16 June 1972.
18. See article 3 (1) of Decree n o 2005/153 of 4th May 2005 bearing on the creation, organization and functioning of a national seed and new plant variety council.
19. Section 2 of Law No 2003/007 of 10th July 2003 to regulate activities of the Fertilizer Sub-sector in Cameroon.
20. Section 7 (1), ibid.
21. Principle 15 of Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 14 June 1992.
22. See Section 2 of Law N o 2003/003 of 21 April 2003 Relating To Phytosanitary Protection.
23. Section 19. (1), ibid.
24. Section 21. (1), ibid.
25. Section 3, ibid.
26. Article 17 of Decree No 2005/0770/PM of 6th April 2005 fixing the modalities for the fight against phytosanitary.
27. Section 18, ibid.
28. Decree N o 2005/0769/PM of 06 April 2005 on the organization of National Phytosanitary Council (NPC).
29. Article 2, ibid.
30. Article 3 (1), ibid.
31. Article 19 of Decree No 2005/0771/PM of 06 April 2005 fixing the modalities of execution of vegetable quaranti ne operations.
32. Article 37, ibid.
33. Principle 14 of Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 14 June 1992.
34. Article 8 of Decree N o 2005/0772/PM of 06 April 2005 fixing the conditions of homologation and control of phytosanitary products.
35. Law No. 96/12 of 5 August 1996 relating to environmental management in Cameroon.
36. Art 20 of Decree N o 2005/0772/PM of 06 April 2005 fixing the conditions of homologation and control of phytosanitary products.
37. Art. 21 (1), ibid.
38. Art. 35 (1), ibid.
39. Art. 35 (2) (I), ibid.
40. Art. 1 of Law N o 2003/006 of 21 April 2003 on the regime of security in matters of modern biotechnology in Cameroon.
41. Art. 17, ibid.
42. Art. 18, ibid.
43. Art. 21, ibid.
44. Art. 22 (2), ibid.
45. Art. 36 (3), ibid.
46. Art. 40 (1), ibid.
47. Art. 56, ibid.
48. Article 1 of Treaty on the conservation and sustainable management of forest ecosystems in Central Africa and to establish the Central African Forests Commission (COMIFAC).
49. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 5 June 1992.
50. Beye, G., (2002), «Impac t of for eign assistance on institutional development of national agricultural research systems in Sub-Saharan Africa», Special Programme for African Agricultural Research Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations Rome, FAO Research and Technology Paper 10, FAO, P. 107.
51. Integrated Assessment of Trade -Related Policies and Biological Diversity in the Agricultural Sector in Cameroon: Impacts of liberalization in the cocoa sector», op. cit., P. 1.
52. Ching, L. L., «Sustainable agriculture: Meeting Food Security Needs, Addressing Climate Change Challenges», P. 1.
53. Ibid., P. 1.
54. Parry, M. et al., (2009), «Climate Change and Hunger Responding to the Challenge», World Food Programme, Rome, P. 30.
55. Thornton, P. et al., (2013), «How Does Climate Change Alter Agricultural Strategies to Support Food Security? » , Background paper for the conference “Food Security Futures: Research Priorities for the 21st Century”, Dublin, P. 2.
56. Ibid., P. 3. NJEL (2019) 1-21 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 19
57. UNCTAD, (2011), «Sustainable Agriculture and Food Security in LDCs», Least Developed Countries Series, UNCTAD Policy Brief, N° 20/C, P. 1.
58. Oxfam, (2011), «Combating rural poverty and hunger through agroforestry in Bolivia», Oxfam GB for Oxfam International, Oxford, UK, P. 3.
59. Thornton, P. et al., op. cit., P. 3.
60. Parry, M. et al., op. cit., P. 4.
61. Storing carbon dioxide.
62. Parry, M. et al., op. cit., P. 27.
63. Thornton, P. et al., op. cit., P. 4.
64. Parry, M. et al., op. cit., P. 4.
65. African Conservation Tillage Network, (2011), «Conservation Agriculture (CA) for Food Security», Act -Update Newsletter vol. 2, P. 1 .
66. Parry, M. et al., op. cit., P. 4.
67. Thornton, P. et al., op. cit., P. 10.
68. Ibid., P. 4.
69. Kleinschmit, J., op. cit., P. 3.
70. Tchoffo, B., op. cit., P. 3.
71. IPPC, (2007), Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Geneva, Switzerland.
72. Tchoffo, B., op. cit., P. 3.
73. Larsson, M., op. cit., P. 3. See also Fonjong, L. N., (2004), «Changing Fortunes of Government Policies and its Implications on the Application of Agricultural Innovations in Cameroon», Nordic Jo urnal of African Studies, Vol. 13, serie (1), P. 13 . See also Benjamin Tchoffo, op. cit., P. 3.
74. Fonjong, L. N., (2004), «Changing Fortunes of Government Policies and its Implications on the Application of Agricultural Innovations in Cameroon», Nordic Journ al of African Studies, Vol. 13, series (1), P. 13.
75. Article VI (1) of the African Convention on the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (Revised version), Maputo, 2003.
76. Article VI (2) of the African Convention on the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (Revised version), Maputo, 2003.
77. Larsson, M., op. cit., P. 4. Enete, A. A. and Amusa, T. A., (2010), «Challenges of Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Change in Nigeria: A Synthesis from the Literature», Field Actions Science Reports, Institute Veolia Environment, Vol. 4, P. 6.
78. Bellarby, J. et al., (2008), «Cool Farming: Climate Impacts of Agriculture and Mitigation Potential», Amsterdam, Greenpeace International.
79. Znaor, D. et al., (2005), «Environmental and Macroeconomic Impact Assessm ent of Different Development Scenarios to Organic and Low -input Farming in Croatia», UK, University of Essex Centre for Environment and Society.
80. Pimbert, M., (1999), «Sustaining the Multiple Functions of Agricultural Biodiversity», FAO background paper series of the Conference on the Multifunctional Character of Agriculture and Land.
81. Kleinschmit, J., op. cit, p. 3
82. Integrated Assessment of Trade -Related Policies and Biological Diversity in the Agricultural Sector in Cameroon: Impacts of liberalization in th e cocoa sector», op. cit., P. 6.
83. Article VI (3)(b) of the African Convention on the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (Revised version), Maputo, 2003.
84. Ching, L. L., op. cit., P. 1. Kucharik, C.J. and Serbin, S.P., (2008), «Impacts of Recent Clim ate Change on Wisconsin Corn and Soybean Yield Trends», Environ. Res. Lett, P. 3.
85. Scialabba, N. E H., op. cit.
86. Kleinschmit, J., op. cit., P. 7.
87. Larsson, M., op. cit., P. 9.
88. The so-called green fertilizer.
89. Larsson, M., op. cit., P. 10.
90. Scialabba, N. E H., op. cit.
91. Khor, M. (2008), «Food Crisis, Climate Change and the Importance of Sustainable Agriculture», Presentation at FAO Food Security Summit, Rome.
92. African Conservation Tillage Network, op. cit., P. 1.
93. Ching, L. L., op. cit., P. 1. NJEL (2019) 1-21 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 20
94. Badgley, C. et al., (2007), «Organic agriculture and the global food supply», Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 22(2), PP. 86-108.
95. Ching, L. L., op. cit., P. 1.
96. Niggli, U. et al., (2008), «Low Greenhouse Gas Agriculture: Mitigation and A daptation Potential of Sustainable Farming Systems», Rome, FAO.
97. Ching, L. L., op. cit., P. 1.
98. UNCTAD, op. cit., P. 2.
99. Oxfam, op. cit., P. 2.
100. Ching, L. L., op. cit., P. 1.
101. Thornton, P. et al., op. cit., P. 6.
102. Ching, L. L., op. cit., P. 1.
103. Thornton, P. et al., op. cit., P. 5.
104. Larsson, M. op. cit., P. 20.
105. Ibid., P. 13.
106. Thornton, P. et al., op. cit., P. 7.
107. Larsson, M. op. cit., P. 20.
108. Thornton, P. et al., op. cit., P. 5.
109. Ching, L. L., op. cit., P. 1.
110. Scialabba, N. E H., op. cit.
111. Zeisemer, J., (2007), «Energy use in organic food systems», Rome, FAO.
112. See Principle 10 of Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 14 June 1992.
113. Thornton, P. et al., op. cit., P. 9.
114. Enete, A. A. and Amusa, T. A., op. cit., P. 8.
115. Parry, M. et al., op. cit., P. 44.
116. UNCTAD, op. cit., P. 2.
117. Parry, M. et al., op. cit., P. 42.
118. Ibid., P. 51.
119. See Principle 22 of Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 14 June 1992.
120. Principle 14 of Stockholm Declarat ion of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 16 June 1972.
121. Principle 1 of Stockholm Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 16 June 1972.
122. Para 3 of the preamble of Stockholm Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 16 June 1972.
123. The National Coordination of the ANCR-NCSA process, op. cit., P. 20.
124. "A development which meets present needs without compromising the capacity of future generations to meet theirs".
125. Para 6, ibid.
126. Para 7, ibid.
127. UNCTAD, op. cit., P. 2.
128. Oxfam, op. cit., P. 2.
129. Ching, L. L., op. cit., P. 1.
130. Thornton, P. et al., op. cit., P. 6.
131. Ching, L. L., op. cit., P. 1.
132. Thornton, P. et al., op. cit., P. 5.
133. Larsson, M. op. cit., P. 20.
134. Ibid., P. 13.
135. Thornton, P. et al., op. cit., P. 7.
136. Larsson, M. op. cit., P. 20.
137. FAO, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_secu rity, (retrieved on 29/5/2018).
138. Thornton, P. et al., op. cit., P. 5.
139. Ching, L. L., op. cit., P. 1.
140. Scialabba, N. E H., op. cit.
141. Zeisemer, J., (2007), «Energy use in organic food systems», Rome, FAO.
142. See Principle 10 of Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 14 June 1992.
143. Thornton, P. et al., op. cit., P. 9.
144. Enete, A. A. and Amusa, T. A., op. cit., P. 8.
145. Parry, M. et al., op. cit., P. 44.
146. UNCTAD, op. cit., P. 2.
147. Parry, M. et al., op. cit., P. 42.
148. Ibid., P. 51.
149. See Principle 22 of Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 14 June 1992.
150. Principle 14 of Stockholm Declaration of the U nited N ations Conference on NJEL (2019) 1-21 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 21 the Human Environment, 16 June 1972.
151. Principle 1 of Stockholm Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 16 June 1972.
152. Para 3 of the preamble of Stockholm Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 16 June 1972.
153. The National Coordination of the ANCR-NCSA process, op. cit., P. 20.
154. "A development which meets present needs without compromising the capacity of future generations to meet theirs".
155. Para 6, ibid.
156. Para 7, ibid. Cite this Article Nah Anthony Tetinwe. Environmental Protection and the Cameroonian Agricultural Policies: What Prospect for implementation. National Journal of Environmental Law. 2019; 2(1): 1–21p.
