Internationalization of Securities Market
Keywords:
Securities Markets, economic internationalisation, US reforms, EU sectoral regulation, competition, monopoliesAbstract
The Internationalization of securities markets has emerged as a significant trend in the global financial landscape, reshaping the way capital is raised, invested, and traded across borders. This process involves the integration and harmonization of financial systems, allowing for cross-border issuance, trading, and investment in securities. The Internationalization of securities markets has gained momentum due to advancements in technology, the liberalization of capital flows, and the increasing interconnectedness of economies. The Internationalization of securities markets offers numerous benefits for both investors and issuers. First, it offers investors a wider range of investments than the domestic market. This allows them to expand their investment potential and increase their returns by taking advantage of the growth of foreign markets. Additionally, globalization provides entrepreneurs
with access to large amounts of capital from international investors and reduces their dependence on domestic capital. Increased access to capital supports business expansion, innovation and economic growth. Furthermore, the Internationalization of securities markets promotes market efficiency, transparency, and liquidity. As markets become more interconnected, information flows more freely, leading to improved price discovery and reduced information asymmetry. This enhances market efficiency and ensures that securities are priced more accurately. Moreover, increased liquidity in international securities markets allows for smoother trading and reduces transaction costs, benefiting both investors and issuers. The globalization of securities markets introduces complexities and potential risks that require vigilant oversight. A fundamental challenge stems from variations in regulatory structures, legal frameworks, and market conventions among different nations. These variations can
create complexities and uncertainties for market participants, hindering the smooth functioning of cross-border transactions. The correlation between regulations, standards and good governance is important to address these issues and create a level playing field for industry participants. An additional concern linked to international trade is the potential for contamination, posing a risk of tainting the entire market. The interconnectedness of securities markets can amplify the impact of financial crises or disruptions in one market, leading to spillover effects on other markets.
References
Prohibition on foreign investment companies absent commission order. See generally sec internationalization report, supra note 1, at VI-9–VI-13.
The obvious model of an "integrated multinational securities market" would appear to be the secondary trading market in Eurobonds, now of long standing. See id. at ch. V. Still, a major limitation on the emergence of an integrated, truly internationalized market remains "[tihe lack of international clearance and settlement links to facilitate cross border settlements, and the existence of widely varying clearance and settlement systems within national markets .... " Id. at 1-13.
48 Stat. 162 (1933) (codified in scattered sections of 12 U.S.C.). On the scope and impact of the Glass-Steagall Act, see generally 2 M. P. MALLOY, THE CORPORATE LAW OF BANKS 551-75 (1988). LAW OF BANKS 551-75 (1988).
Staff of Securities and Exchange Commission, Report on the Internationalization of the Securities Markets, I-I N.] (1987) [Hereinafter Sec Internationalization REPORT]. See also id. at 1-19
J.D., University of Pennsylvania; Ph.D., Georgetown University; Professor of Law, Fordham University School of Law.
Tomoko A. Regulation of insider trading in Japan. Columbia Law Rev. 1989; 89: 1296–1319.
Allen JW. The internationalization of securities trading markets. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress; 1986. [Online] Available at https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/131284NCJRS.pdf [Accessed on March 2024]
Wendy C. Too few countries, too many funds? Inst Invest. 1990: 179.
Faith in the future. Corporate Finance. 1990: 17.
Grundfest JA. The damning facts of a new stocks tax. Wall Street J. 1990; A12.
Hershey RD Jr. (1990). Greenspan opposes rescue of failing securities firms. The New York Times, Section D, p. 2.
Kollar M. (1983). After three attempts Globex will debut. J Commerc. 1990; 7A.
Honegger Jr. PC. Demystification of the Swiss banking secrecy and illumination of the United States-Swiss Memorandum of understanding. NC J Intl Law. 1983. [Online] Available at https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1210&context=ncilj [Accessed on March 2024]
