The Development of Consumer Protection Law in Cameroon: Addressing the New Era Legal Challenges of Obtaining Effective Remedies for Defective Products
Keywords:
Consumer Protection, Cameroon, Defective Products, New Era Legal Challenges, Effective Remedies, Globalization, Digitalization, Regulatory Enforcement, Consumer Education, Dispute Resolution Mechanisms.Abstract
The landscape of consumer protection in Cameroon has undergone significant transformations in recent years, driven by the country's rapid economic growth, increasing consumer awareness, and the advent of new technologies. However, despite these advancements, consumers in Cameroon continue to face numerous challenges in obtaining effective remedies for defective products. This study explores the development of consumer protection in Cameroon, with a focus on the new era legal challenges that have arisen in the context of obtaining effective remedies for defective products. Using a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods, this study examines the current legal framework for consumer protection in Cameroon, including the strengths and weaknesses of the existing laws and regulations. The study also investigates the impact of globalization, digitalization, and other external factors on the consumer protection landscape in Cameroon, and identifies the emerging legal challenges that consumers and regulatory authorities face in addressing defective products. The findings of this study reveal that while Cameroon has made significant progress in strengthening its consumer protection laws and regulations, there are still significant gaps and challenges that need to be addressed. The study recommends a range of measures to enhance consumer protection in Cameroon, including the development of more effective dispute resolution mechanisms, the strengthening of regulatory enforcement, and the promotion of consumer education and awareness. This study contributes to the ongoing debate on consumer protection in Cameroon and provides a timely analysis of the new era legal challenges that need to be addressed to ensure that consumers have access to effective remedies for defective products.
References
Kessler, F., (2016), Consumer Protection Law in Africa: A Comparative Study, Routledge. This book provides a comprehensive analysis of consumer protection law in Africa, including Cameroon.
Mbah, E. (2018), The Evolution of Consumer Protection in Cameroon: Challenges and Prospect, Journal Consumer Protection, 31(2), pp.147-164.
Law No. 2015/018 of 21 December 2015, governing Commercial activities in Cameroon.
The French Civil Code of 1804.
See the 2016 Cameroon Penal Code.
See Law No. 90/035 of August 10, 1990 to Regulate Commercial Activities in Cameroon as amended by Law No. 2015/018, of 21 December 2015.
Law no. 2010/012 of 21st December, 2010 on Electronic Commerce and Law no. 2006/018 of 29th December 2006 to amend Law no.88/016 of 16 December 1988 to Regulate Advertising in Cameroon.
In 2011, the Legal Framework on Consumer Protection was enacted through Law No. 2011/012 of 06 May 2011.
ALVINE LONGLA BOMA, (2021), Principles of Consumer Protection Law, ULTRANET, Bafoussam, p.24.
Resolution 39/248 of 16 April 1985 on the United Nation Guidelines on Consumer Protection 1985 (as amended in 1999).
The African Union’s Consumer Policy is an important step towards promoting the rights and interests of African Consumers, and ensuring that businesses operate fairly and transparently across the continent.
BOMA, A.L., (2011), Contemporary Challenges in Consumer Protection Discourse: Identifying the Consumer Under Cameroonian Law, Juridis Periodique, Revue de Droit e de Science Politique, Universite de Dschang, No. 87, pp.68-79.
Law No. 2010/012 of 21st December, 2010 on Cyber Security and Cyber Criminality.
B.F., Biboum, Droit Camerounaise de Consommation, Presse Universitaires Libres, L’A.VU.DR.A., Douala, Cameroon, 2016.
Stapleton, J., (1994), Product Liability, Butterworth’s. See equally Owen, D. G., (2008), Products Liability Law, Thomson Reuters.
ALVINE LONGLA BOMA, (2021), op cit., p.128.
(1938) 4 AII ER.
Winfield, P.H., The History of Negligence in the Law of Torts, (1926) 42 Law Quarterly Review (LQR) 184.
ALVINE LONGLA BOMA, (2021), op cit., p.129.
Boma, A.L., The concept of Merchantable Quality within the Context of the Sale of Goods Law in Cameroon: Of What Relevance to Consumer Expectations?, in African Journal of Social Sciences (AJOSS) (2010) Vol. 1 (2) Faculty of Social and Management Sciences, University of Buea-Cameroon, pp.68-78.
Alvine Longla Boma, “Consumer Protection: A Cameroonian Perspective”, Revue Africaines des Sciences Juridiques (2011), Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 47-62, p.47.
Murray, A., (2019), Product Liability and Safety: A Global Perspective, Bloomsbury Publishing. This book provides an in-depth analysis of product liability and safety laws around the world, including Cameroon
Sale of Good Act 1979 and Product Liability Directive No. 85/374/EEC for instance requires that goods be fit for their intended purpose.
Caroline London and Michael Llamas, “Packaging Laws in France and Germany”, (1994) 6 (1) Journal of Environmental Law, p.1-3.
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Consumer Product Safety Act for example regulate the labeling and packaging of food, drugs, and cosmetics in the United States.
Serge-Patrick Levoa Awona, ‘‘Defaut de Confornité et Défaut Caché dans la Vente Commerciale OHADA: Retour a la Case Depart?’’, Recueil d’etudes sur l’OHADA et les normes juridiques africaines (2013), Vol. VI, pp. 317-337, p.317-320. See Charles Mba-Owono, ‘‘Non-conformité et vices cachés dans la vente commerciale en droit uniforme africain, (2002) 41 Juridis Périodique, pp.107-127.
Sale of Good Act 1979.
Djieufack, R., The Seller’s Liability for Non-conformity of Goods in a Contract of Sale under the OHADA Uniform Act on General Commercial Law: A Critical Analysis, Journal of African Law, Vol. 60, Issue 3, (2016), pp.469-490.
Product Liability Directive No. 85/374/EEC.
Ibid.
(1932) AC 562.
George G. Rogert, ‘‘Express Warranties in Sales of Goods’’, (1923-1924) 33 Yale Law Journal, pp. 14-32,
Warnings serve the function of acquainting the consumer with dangers associated with the product while instructions for use direct how the optimum beneficial effects may be achieved by using the product in a particular way.
See the case of Vac well Engineering Ltd v. B.D.H. Chemicals Ltd. (1971) 1 Q.B.
Nkongho, R., (2020), "Product Liability in Cameroon: A Critical Analysis of the Law and Practice." African Journal of Marketing Management, 12(1), 1-15.
No. 85/374/EEC.
ALVINE LONGLA BOMA, (2021), op cit., p.132.
In the case of Nelson v. Anderson (1955) 245 Minn 445, for example, a plaintiff continued to use an oil burner that he knew was not functioning properly. He was injured when the burner exploded. The Minnesota court denied liability on the part of the manufacturer of the burner.
Under the sub-section, liability for defective product can be avoided by proving that: ‘’the state of scientific and technical knowledge at the relevant time was not such that a producer of the products of the same description as the product in question might be expected to have discovered the defect if it had existed in his products while they were under his control.
Winter Bottom v. Wright (18420 152 Eng. Rep. 402
(1932) AC 562.
ALVINE LONGLA BOMA, (2021), op cit, p.130.
Clive Schmitthoff, The Journal of Business Law 91987) P.75.
Supra.
Yagba, T.A.T., Consumer Remedies (1999), Modus International Law and Business Quarterly, Vol. 4 No. 2 at 15-21.
Dr. Maria Ioannidou, “Remedies for Defective Products: A Comparative Analysis", Journal of Consumer Policy, (2020) - This article compares the different remedies available to consumers in various jurisdictions.
Here the consumer receives a complete refund of the purchase price.
Here the consumer receives a store credit refund, which can be used to purchase other products.
Here the consumer receives a partial refund, often due to depreciation or usage.
These are damages which are intended to compensate the consumer for actual losses or injuries suffered.
It is intended to punish the manufacturer or seller for their negligence or wrongdoing.
It is intended to compensate the consumer for indirect losses or injuries suffered, such as lost wages or medical expenses.
These are temporary court order that requires the manufacturer or seller to stop producing, selling, or distributing the defective product until a final decision is made.
These are permanent court order that requires the manufacturer or seller to permanently stop producing, selling, or distributing the defective product.
This is a court order that requires the manufacturer or seller to take specific actions, such as recalling the defective product or providing refunds to consumers.
Some of the Key Features of specific performance is specific performance is based on the contractual obligations between the buyer and seller, a court order is required to compel the manufacturer or seller to perform their contractual obligations and specific performance may involve repairing or replacing the defective product.
Where the manufacturer or seller breaches their contractual obligations, such as failing to repair or replace a defective product.
Where the product is defective and the manufacturer or seller is responsible for repairing or replacing it.
Where damages may not be sufficient to compensate the buyer for the loss or injury suffered.
Ernst Rabel, “The Nature of Warranty of Quality”, (1950), vol. 24 (3) Tulane Law Review, pp. 273-287
This is a written or oral statement made by the manufacturer or seller that promises to repair, replace, or refund a defective product.
This is an unwritten promise that the product will meet certain standards of quality and performance.
This is an optional warranty that extends the coverage period beyond the original warranty.
This is a guarantee made by the manufacturer that the product will meet certain standards of quality or performance.
This is a guarantee made by the seller that the product will meet certain standards of quality or performance.
This is a guarantee that offers a full or partial refund if the product does not meet certain standards of quality or performance.
Prof. John W. Gale, "The Effectiveness of Product Recalls as a Remedy for Defective Products", Journal of Product Liability, (2019). This article examines the effectiveness of product recalls as a remedy for defective products.
Here a manufacturer or seller initiates a recall voluntarily, often in response to consumer complaints or regulatory pressure.
Here a regulatory agency, such as the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), requires a manufacturer or seller to recall a defective or hazardous product.
Here a manufacturer or seller takes corrective action to repair or replace a defective product, rather than recalling it.
Resolution 39/248 of 16 April 1985 on the United Nation Guidelines on Consumer Protection 1985 (as amended in 1999).
