THE INTERFACE BETWEEN MARRIAGE AND ADOPTION RIGHTS FOR THE LGBTQIA+: A CONSERVATIVE APPROACH UNDER THE FACADE OF PRACTICALITY?
Keywords:
Marriage, Adoption, LGBTQIA, Family Law, Same-Sex Marriage.Abstract
The 21st century India stands at the crossroads of proliferating socio-cultural maturation and adherence to dogmatic notions about social institutions. The horizons of love, unity and togetherness in today’s global community have grown and expanded. In stark contrast to such expanding horizons, the LGBTQIA+ community though diverse and growing, remains a stigmatised community. India is home to more than 2.5 million individuals belonging to the LGBTQIA+ community, yet the legal scenario and jurisprudence surrounding them is far from developed. The family laws are obsolete, riddled with ambiguity and lack of clarity. Though homosexuality is decriminalised, the community still struggles for rights as basic as marriage and adoption. This paper aims to establish an interface between marriage and adoption laws vis-à-vis the LGBTQIA+ community in India. Part I of the paper provides a comprehensive understanding of the legal status of the LGBTQIA+ community’s marriage and adoption laws in India and internationally. Part II of the paper provides a thorough review of existent literature on the marriage and adoption laws for the community. Part III of the paper provides an understanding of the primary research questions and methodology. Part IV of the paper is a discussion of the findings and prevalent trends along with reforms suggested by the authors.
Key Words: Marriage, Adoption, LGBTQIA, Family Law, Same-Sex Marriage
References
1. Gita Thadani. Encyclopaedia of Love in World Religions. Bloomsbury Gender Studies; 2016.
2. Jeffery S. Siker. Homosexuality and Religion. Greenwood Press; 2006 (1): 10.
3. Suneeta Singh et. al. A People Stronger: The Collectivization of MSM and TG groups in India . SAGE Publication; 2012: 83.
4. Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2009) 160 Delhi Law Times 277.
5. Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation (2014) 1 SCC 1.
6. Navtej Singh Johar v.Union of India (2018) AIR 2018 SC 4321.
7. Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; s. 5(iii).
8. Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; s, 9, s. 12(2), s. 13, s. 24, Indian Christian Marriage Act; 1872, s. 51.
9. Special Marriage Act, 1954; s. 4(c).
10. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act 1937; s. 2 and s. 3.
11. Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872; s. 60(1).
12. Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936; s. 2(5) and 2(9).
13. Gregory M. Herek. Legal Recognition of Same -Sex Relationships in the United States: A Social Science Perspective. Journal of American Psychology; 2006; (6): 607.
14. Indian Constitution 1950; art. 14.
15. Indian Constitution 1950; art. 15.
16. Hereinafter HAMA.
17. Adoption Regulation Rules,2017; s. 5(3).
18. Hereinafter CARA.
19. CARA 2011; Guideline 6(2).
20. Adoption Regulation Rules, 2017; s. 5(2)(b) and 5(2)(c).
21. CARA; Guideline 9(8).
22. Reuters. Marriage Equality Around the World . Human Rights Campaign Foundation . 2021; Available from < https://www.hrc.org/resources/marriage-equality-around-the-world> accessed 11th November, 2021.
23. Christian Gonzalex Cabrera. Costa Rica First in Central America to Legalize Same -sex Marriage. Human Rights Watch. 2020; Available at <https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/05/26/costa-rica-first- central-america-legalize-same-sex-marriage> last accessed 1st November, 2020.
24. Nina Chestney . Swiss lawmakers approve draft legislation for same -sex marriage . World Economic Forum . 2020; Available at <https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/switzerland- lawmakers-legislation-gay-marriage-lgbt-bill/> last accessed 1st November, 2020.
25. CFR Staff . Marriage Equality: Global Comparisons . Council on Foreign Relations . 2021; Available at <https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/marriage-equality-global-comparisons> last accessed 10th November, 2021.
26. Marc Hooghe , Cecil Meeusen . Is Same -sex marriage Legislation related to attitudes towards Homosexuality? Sexuality Research and Social Policy; 2013; (10) 258.
27. Reuters. Important International Jurisprudence Concerning LGBT Rights . Human Rights Watch. 2009; Available at <https://www.hrw.org/news/2009/05/25/important-international-jurisprudence- concerning-lgbt-rights> last accessed 9th November.
28. Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948, art 16.
29. Elizabeth Burleson. International Human Rights Law, Co -parent Adoption, and the Recognition of Gay and Lesbian Families. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review; 2009: 791.
30. Zhan Chiam Sandra Duffy Matilda González Gil . Trans Legal Mapping Report . International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association; 2017 (2).
31. Sofi Ahsan. Centre opposes same -sex marriage in Delhi HC, says not comparable with ‘Indian family unit concept . The Indian Express . 2021 Feb 26; Available at < https://indianexpress.com/article/india/same-sex-marriages-legal-recognition-centre-7204303/>
32. Surrogacy Regulation Bill, 2019, s. 4(ii).
33. Herek GM. Sexual Stigma and Sexual Prejudice in the United States: A Conceptual Framework on Contemporary Perspectives on Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identities. American Psychological Association; 2009: 65.
34. Hatzenbuehler ML, Link B . Introduction to the Special issues on Structural Stigma and Health. Social Science and Medicine; 2014: 103.
35. V. Revathy, Dr. S. Pandiaraj. The violation of human rights against LGBT community in India- A critical study. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics; 2018.
36. Fiza Khan, Dilsana Khan. LGBT Rights in India: The Status Quo . International Journal of Law Management & Humanities; 2020 (3).
37. Aparup Khatua et al. Tweeting in Support of LGBT? A Deep Learning Approach (2019) ACM India Joint International Conference on Data Science and Management; 2019: 342.
38. Vinay Arote. Coronavirus Lockdown brings in a wave of Hostiliy . India Times. 2020 May 17; Available at <https://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/others/health -lifestyle/idahotb-2020- coronavirus-lockdown-brings-in-a-wave-of-hostility-for-the-lgbtqia- community/articleshow/75784985.cms>.
39. Deni Mazrekaj at. al. School Outcomes of Children Raised by Same-Sex Parents: Evidence from Administrative Panel Data. American Sociological Review; 2020 (5); 830.
40. Prashasti Awasthi. India’s Adoption Policy against LGBTQIA, 20 Million Kids remain without Family the Logical Indian 2019 November 10; Available at <https://thelogicalindian.com/exclusive/adoption-policy-discriminative-against- lqbtqia/?infinitescroll=1> last accessed 10th November, 2021.
41. Glasow, P. A. Fundamentals of Survey Research Methodology. MITRE; 2005: 129.
42. Abantika Ghosh. ‘Single-parent norm hurts our conscience, so no adoptions’, says Missionaries of Charity’, Indian Express . 2021 November 15; Available at < https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/one-parent-norm-hurts-our-conscience- so-no-adoptions-missionaries-of-charity/>.
43. Shreya Kalra. Why India's adoption rate is abysmal despite its 30 million abandoned kids . The Business Standard . 2018 October 30; Available at < https://www.business- standard.com/article/current-affairs/why-india-s-adoption-rate-is-abysmal-despite-its-30-million- abandoned-kids- 118103000218_1.html#:~:text=The%20social%20costs%20of%20government,rates%2C%20amo ng%20other%20development%20goals.>.
44. Silke Koltrowitz. Switzerland votes to make same-sex marriage legal by near two-thirds majority. Reuters. 2021 September 26; Available at <https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/swiss-vote- allowing-same-sex-marriage-referendum-2021-09-26/> last accessed 10th November, 2021.
45. Janees Rafiq. Being LGBT in India: Some Hard Truths ; International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research; 2020: (11): 7.
