The Problem of Gender Bias in Maintenance and Alimony: A Critical Study of Indian Family Law
Keywords:
Indian family law, alimony and maintenance, influential factors, international comparison, Gender bias, multidimensional problems, legal and social reformsAbstract
The paper examines gender bias in maintenance and alimentary laws in India. While legal provisions such as the HMA [Hindu Marriage Act] and various personal laws appear to be gender neutral on paper, their real-world applications are tied to patriarchal assumptions. Men have been facing social and legal barriers, while women have been the preferred recipients of this provision of law. Through doctrinal analysis, judicial trends, and international comparisons, this research reveals the inconsistencies and systemic gaps that prevent equitable outcomes. It argues that there are social inequalities and judicial arbitrariness. This paper also proposes legal and social reforms intended for fairness. In doing so, it envisions family law to evolve with societal changes.
References
Paras Diwan, Law of Marriage and Divorce in India 327–29 (11th ed. 2020).
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, § 125, No. 2, Acts of Parliament, 1974 (India).
Hindu Adoptions & Maintenance Act, 1956, § 18, No. 78, Acts of Parliament, 1956 (India).
Hindu Adoptions & Maintenance Act, 1956, §§ 20–22, No. 78, Acts of Parliament, 1956 (India).
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, § 24, No. 25, Acts of Parliament, 1955 (India).
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, § 25, No. 25, Acts of Parliament, 1955 (India).
Rameshwara Daga v. Rameshwari Daga, (2005) 2 SCC 33 (India).
Chand Dhawan v. Jawahar Dhawan, (1993) 3 SCC 406 (India).
Supra note 1.
Indian Divorce Act, 1869, § 36, No. 4, Acts of Parliament, 1869 (India).
Indian Divorce Act, 1869, § 37, No. 4, Acts of Parliament, 1869 (India).
K. Kumar v. Leena, (2004) 6 SCC 256 (India).
Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal, (2010) 10 SCC 469 (India).
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, § 2(f), No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 2005 (India).
Special Marriage Act, 1954, §§ 36–37, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 1954 (India).
Supra note 1.
A. Gopika, A Study on Maintenance Rights of Women in India, 11 Int’l J. Innovative Fundament. & Multidisciplinary Res. 746 (2023), https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2023/6/9750.pdf.
Dr. Kulbhushan v. Raj Kumari, AIR 1971 SC 234 (India).
Yashpal Singh Thakur v. Smt. Anjana Rajput, (2022) 4 SCC 404 (India).
Rajnesh v. Neha and Another, (2021) 2 SCC 32.
Parvin Kumar Jain v. Anju Jain, 2023 SCC OnLine Del 3733 (India).
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, § 25(2), No. 25, Acts of Parliament, 1955 (India).
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, § 25(3), No. 25, Acts of Parliament, 1955 (India).
Supra note 17.
Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, (1985) 2 SCC 556 (India).
Alimony in Divorce Cases: How Indian Courts Calculate It, India Today (Mar. 20, 2025), https://www.indiatoday.in/business/story/alimony-calculation-divorce-cases-court-guidelines-india-global-yuzvendra-chahal-dhanashree-verma-2696382-2025-03-20.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Divya Ajit, Legal Insights on Family Law: A Comprehensive Study, (Oct. 2024), https://jlrjs.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/200.-Divya-Ajit.pdf.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Supra note 26.
Supra note 29.
Supra note 29.
