Abortion Law the Fundamental Right of Women: A Comparative Study Between India and United Sta

Authors

  • Malobika Bose Amity Law School, Amity University Uttar Pradesh
  • Abhinav Singh

Keywords:

Reproductive rights, abortion law, India, the US, The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, Roe v. Wade, Dobbs v. Jackson, court rulings, reproductive autonomy, sociocultural barriers, the legal system, public health, policy reform, and gender justice

Abstract

Abortion continues to be one of the most hotly contested legal and moral topics in the world, with a wide range of political, religious, and cultural viewpoints. This study compares and contrasts the abortion laws in the US and India, looking at how they affect women's basic rights to healthcare and reproductive autonomy. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, which governs abortion in India, has a comparatively permissive framework, but societal stigma and the lack of adequate healthcare infrastructure make it difficult to implement. The United States, on the other hand, has seen a change from federal protection under Roe v. Wade (1973) to a state-regulated model after Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organisation (2022), which has resulted in notable differences in access to abortions between states. The study investigates the ways in which sociocultural elements, legislative frameworks, and court rulings affect the right to an abortion in both nations. India has a consistent legal system, however there are still issues with enforcement. However, because of statelevel restrictions, access to abortion varies greatly in the US, disproportionately affecting underprivileged populations. This study emphasises the necessity of a well-rounded legal strategy that protects women's reproductive rights while attending to moral and public health issues. This study adds to the conversation on reproductive justice by examining laws, significant court decisions, and sociopolitical factors. It provides suggestions for enhancing legislative frameworks in both India and the US and emphasizes the significance of policy changes to protect women's rights and access to safe abortion services.

References

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 312-316.

Mukherjee, S. “Maternal Mortality and Unsafe Abortions in India,” Health Journal, 2018.

Report of the Shantilal Shah Committee, Ministry of Health, 1966.

The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, Section 3.

Ibid.

Ibid, Section 5.

The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021.

Ibid, Clause (ii) of Section 3.

Ibid, Section 3B.

Suchita Srivastava v. Chandigarh Administration, AIR 2010 SC 235.

Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.

X v. Union of India, (2017) 3 SCC 123.

Bansal, N. “Barriers to Abortion Access in Rural India,” Journal of Women's Health, 2021.

Ibid.

Sharma, R. “Social Stigma Around Abortion in India,” Indian Medical Review, 2019.

The Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994.

Gupta, A. “Judicial Delays in Abortion Cases,” Law and Society Review, 2020.

Mittal, P. “Religious Perspectives on Abortion in India,” Cultural Studies Journal, 2016.

Choudhary, K. “Abortion and Gender Equity in India,” Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 2018.

Srivastava, M. “Adolescents and Abortion Access,” Health Policy Review, 2022.

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).

Ibid.

Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).

Ibid.

Center for Reproductive Rights, “State-Level Abortion Restrictions,” 2021.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. (2022).

Ibid.

California Legislative Council, “California Abortion Protections Act,” 2023.

Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 171.

National Public Radio, “Trigger Laws Following Dobbs,” July 2022.

Greenhouse, L. “Constitutional Debates on Abortion,” Harvard Law Review, 2022.

Pew Research Center, “Religious Views on Abortion in America,” 2022.

Swedish Abortion Act, 1974, p.45.

Public Health Code, France, Article L2212-1, p.78.

Northern Ireland (Executive Formation etc.) Act, 2019, p.104.

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), p.21.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. (2022), p.56.

Texas Senate Bill 8 (Heartbeat Bill), 2021, p.134.

Nigeria’s Criminal Code, Sections 228-230, p.76.

Mozambique’s Penal Code Amendment, 2014, p.165.

WHO, Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates, 2021, p.220.

Published

2025-05-20