Inheritance Laws and Gender Inequality in India: The Case for a Uniform Civil Code
Keywords:
- Inheritance, Inequality, Religion, Customary laws, constitutional scrutinyAbstract
India’s legal system currently allows different religious communities to regulate their Personal Laws, including inheritance, which has historically resulted in gender-biased practices. Though there have been legislative reforms such as amendment of the Hindu Succession Act in 2005 and progressive judicial rulings, disparities persist especially among Muslim, Christian, and Parsi women, who have unequal rights of inheritance compared to their male counterparts. This article analyzes how the right to religious freedom enshrined under Articles 25–28 of the Constitution sustains these inequalities and how Article 13, which subjects laws to fundamental rights, exempts Personal Laws from constitutional scrutiny. Various landmark judgments such as Narasu Appa Mali and Shayara Bano highlight the inconsistency in the judiciary’s approach to Personal Laws. Further, it is argued that religion-based legal inequalities perpetuate economic insecurity and marginalization of women especially in the matter of inheritance. The article brings to discussion how a phased introduction of a Uniform Civil Code supported by public awareness campaigns to overcome resistance can help mitigate the inequality and discrimination faced by women of different religions.
References
Sarla Mudgal vs. Union of India 1995 AIR 1531
Akansha Baibhav, “GENDER EQUALITY AND RIGHT OF SUCCESSION,”
https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details?id=undefined&ifile=undefined.
Khushi Shukla, “Gender Inequality in Muslim Personal Law - ADJUVA LEGAL”,
https://adjuvalegal.com/divorce/gender-inequality-in-muslim-personal-law/.
The Quran, Surah An-Nisa (4:11), Sahih International Translation.
Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 50, Clause (d)
Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, (2020) 9 SCC 1
Shukla, V.N., Constitution of India, edited by Mahendra P. Singh, 13th ed., Eastern Book
Company, 2017
State of Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali, AIR 1952 Bom 84
Zahid Maniyar, “Personal Laws Vis-à-Vis Fundamental Rights, Part III of the
Constitution,” CJP, https://cjp.org.in/personal-laws-vis-a-vis-fundamental-rights-part-iii-
of-the-constitution/.
State of Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali, AIR 1952 Bom 84, Para 12
State of Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali, AIR 1952 Bom 84, Para 13
Krishna Singh v. Mathura Ahir, AIR 1980 SC 707
Pannalal Bansilal Pitti and others vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, 1996 AIR 1023
Pannalal Bansilal Pitti and others vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, 1996 AIR 1023, Para 12
C. Masilamani Mudaliar v. Idol of Sri Swaminathaswami Swaminathaswami Thirukoil,
(1996) 8 SCC 525
C. Masilamani Mudaliar v. Idol of Sri Swaminathaswami Swaminathaswami Thirukoil,
(1996) 8 SCC 525, Para 15
Shayara Bano v. Union of India, (2017) 9 SCC 1
Narsingh Pratap Deo v. State of Orissa, AIR 1964 SC 1793
Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala, (2019) 11 SCC 1
Murali Krishnan, “The Beginning of the End of 67-Year-Old Narasu Appa Mali and a
Tale of Two Judges,” Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news, September 28, 2018,
https://www.barandbench.com/columns/end-67-year-old-narasu-appa-mali-tale-two-
judges-supreme-court-sabarimala.
Mohd Ahmed Khan vs. Shah Bano Begum, 1985 AIR 945
Vanshika Kapoor, “Shah Bano Case,” iPleaders (blog), August 16, 2023,
https://blog.ipleaders.in/shah-bano-case/.
Mary Roy v. State of Kerala, AIR 1986 SC 1011
Rachit Garg, “Uniform Civil Code : Problems and Prospects,” iPleaders (blog), July 26,
, https://blog.ipleaders.in/uniform-civil-code-problems-prospects/.
Kapoor, “Shah Bano Case.”



