From Shah Bano to Shayara Bano: Developing the Rights of Muslim Women

Authors

  • Isha Kapoor Kapoor School of Law and Legal Studies, Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies, Pitampura, India

Keywords:

The Holy Quran, Personal law, Rights of women, Muslim law, Constitutional Assembly debates, The Constitution of India, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Shariat Act, Iddat period, Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, Fundamental rights, Divorce, Marriage, Maintenance, Triple talaq, Talaq-e-biddat, Shah Bano, Shayara Bano, Islamic law, Uniform Civil Code

Abstract

The present paper highlights the development and changes that have happened in the rights of the women belonging to the Muslim religion. The concern of the paper is the rights of Muslim women in terms of marriage and divorce primarily. We have attempted to trace the historical developments by focusing on the Quranic aspects of the same, and then the decision rendered by various courts along with the legislations have been examined. The reformatory nature of The Holy Quran and the logic behind the principle enshrined therein has been consistently highlighted throughout the paper. Excerpts and relevant discussions from the Constitutional Assembly debates have been considered in order to penetrate the fundamentals of the Constitution with respect to family law. The constitutional perspective of the Muslim personal law, consisting of rules relating to women along with the various criticisms faced by the same, has been addressed. The paper focuses on the era between the two historic judgments rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court of India in the cases of Mohd Ahmad Khan vs Shah Bano Begum and Shayara Bano vs Union of India. Various decisions on the subject were rendered by various subordinate courts during that crucial period. The paper first mentions the historical background to the rights and then begins to analyze the decision and its aftermath in a chronological order.

 

Author Biography

  • Isha Kapoor Kapoor, School of Law and Legal Studies, Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies, Pitampura, India

    Isha Kapoor

    Student,

    School of Law and Legal Studies,

    Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies, Pitampura, India

     

References

1. Mohammed Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum. AIR 1985 SC 945.

2. Shayara Bano v. Union of India . AIR 2017 SC 4609.

3. Bhattacharjee A M. Muslim Law and the Constitution. Eastern Law House, Kolkata (Calcutta), 3rd edn., 2016.

4. Wani MA. Maintenance Rights of Muslim Women. Genuine Publications, New Delhi, 1st edn., 1987. Developing the Rights of Muslim Women Kapoor and Saini JFAL (2018) 18-30 © Law Journals 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 29

5. Sharma A. Human Rights of Women in India. Regal Publication, New Delhi . 2013.

6. Mufti ST. Status of Muslim Women in India. Regal Publications, New Delhi, 2013.

7. Al-Quran, II: 1877.

8. Singh RK. Muslim Law. 2011; 57.

9. Hedaya. Hamilton’s Translation , Ed. II, 25p.

10. Mufti ST. Status of Muslim Women in India. Regal Publications, New Delhi , 2013.

11. Lily Thomas v. Union of India. AIR 2000 SC 1650.

12. Rashid SK. Muslim Law. Eastern Book Company, Lucknow, 3rd edn., 1996.

13. VII Constit uent Assembly Debates 111 (1949) at 540–541.

14. Id. at 547–548, 543p.

15. Mahmood T. Muslim Personal Law . All India Reporter, Ltd., N agpur, 2nd edn., 1983.

16. Mahmood T. Mus lim Personal Law. All India Reporter, Ltd., Nagpur, 2nd edn., 1983.

17. Asaf AA Fyzee. A Modern A pproach to Islam 98-99. Asia Publishing House, Bombay, 1st edn., 1963.

18. Mahmood T. Wom anhood in Islam. In: Bhatia HS. Studies i n Islamic Law, Religion and Society 358. Deep & Deep Publications. 1989.

19. Asaf AA Fyzee. A Modern Approach to Islam 111. Asia P ublishing House, Bombay, 1st edn., 1963.

20. The Constitution of India, Art. 13.

21. AIR 1980 SC 707.

22. State of Bombay v. Naras u Appa M ali. AIR 1952 Bom 85.

23. Mahmood T. Muslim Personal Law 90. All India Reporter Ltd., Nagpur, 2nd edn., 1983.

24. The Constitution of India.

25. Holy Quran. 2: 241.

26. Mufti ST. Status of Muslim Women in India 217. Regal Publications, New Delhi. 2013.

27. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act 2 of 1974). S 125.

28. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act 2 of 1974). S 125.

29. AIR 1979 SC 362.

30. AIR 1980 SC 1730.

31. Mohammed Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum. AIR 1985 SC 945.

32. The Constitution of India, Art. 15.

33. Mahmood T. Womanh ood in I slam. In: Bhatia HS. Studies in Islam ic Law, Religion and Society 354. Deep & Deep Publications. 1989.

34. Qur’an. II: 228.

35. Mahmood T. Womanhood in Islam. In: Bhatia HS. Studies in Islamic Law, Religion and Society 357. Deep & Deep Publications. 1989.

36. Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer. Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 47. Eastern Book Co., Lucknow . 1987.

37. State of Bombay v . Narasu Appa Mali . AIR 1952 Bom. 85.

38. Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer. Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 47. Eastern Book Co., Lucknow . 1987.

39. Mohammed Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum. AIR 1985 SC 945.

40. Mohammed Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum. AIR 1985 SC 945.

41. Modi Z. 10 Judgments That Changed India 60. Penguin Random House, In dia. 2013).

42. Syed Khalid Rashid, Muslim La w 167. Eastern Book Company, Lucknow , 3rd edn., 1996.

43. Modi Z. 10 Judgments That Changed India 60 -61. Penguin Random House, India. 2013).

44. 1994 Supp (1) SCC 713.

45. Danial Latifi v. Union of India (2001) 7 SCC 740.

46. The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (Act 25 of 1986), S 3.

47. Hasenara Begum v. Fazar Ali (2001) 2 Gau. L.J. 635 at 640p. (Gau.).

48. AIR 1990 AP 225 (FB).

49. Raja Mohamed v. Moimoon 1992 Cr LJ 374; Abdul Rashid v Sultana Begum 1992 Cri. LJ 76 (Cal); Abdul Haq v. Yasim Talat 1998 Cri LJ 3433 (M.P.).

50. Usman Khan v. Fatimunni sa. AIR 1990 AP 225 (FB); Raja Mohamed v. Moimoon, 1992 Cr LJ 374; Ali v. Sufaira (1998) 3 JFAL (2018) 18-30 © Law Journals 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 30 Crimes 147; Aliyar v. Pathan 1988(2) Ker LJ 46; Kunhammed Hazi v. Amina II (1995) DMC 479.

51. Arab Ahamedia Abdulla v Arab Bai Mohumma Saiyaddin. AIR 1988 Guj 141; Hasram v Abdul Rahim 1989 Cr LJ 1519.

52. Zumaiteen v Ameena Begum . 1997(2) LW 31; Karim Ahmed v She hnaz 2000 Cr LJ 3536.

53. Danial latifi v. Union of India (2001) 7 SCC 740.

54. Danial latifi v. Union of India (2001) 7 SCC 740.

55. (2001) 7 SCC 740.

56. Abdul Latif Mondal v An uwara Khatoon. 2002 Cr LJ 2282; Mohamed Siddique v Mst. Fatema 2007 Cr LJ 2363; (2003) 6 SCC 93.

57. M.C. Haseena v Mundakka Paraman Abdul Jaleel. 2007 Cr LJ 1554.

58. Shabana Bano v Imran Khan (2010)1 SCC 666.

59. Mufti ST . Status of Muslim Women in India 126. Regal Publications, New Delhi. 2013.

60. Khurshid S. Triple Talaq Examining Faith 1st edn., 2018.

61. Shayara Bano v. Union of India. AIR 2017 SC 4607.

62. AIR 2017 SC 4607.

63. II (1994) DMC 64.

64. Zafer MR. Unilateral Divorce in Muslim Personal Law. In Mahmood T. Islamic Law in Modern India 171. N.M. Tripathi Pvt. Ltd. 1972.

65. Sri Jiauddin Ahamed v Mrs. Anwar Begam. 1981(1) GLR 358 (SC); Mst. Rukia v Abdul Kaliquie . 1988 (1) GLR (DB).

66. AIR 2002 SC 3551.

67. Iqbal Banu v State of U.P . (2007) 6 SCC 785.

68. Zamrut Begum v K.M.D. Haneet 2003(3) ALD 220; Wahi Mohamed v Bakkla Bai 2003 Cr LJ 2755 ; Khannubi v Salim 2003 Cr LJ 2888; Musaraf Jaham v State of Bihar AIR 2008 Pat 69; Ummer Farooque v Naseema 2005(4) KLT 565 ( DB); Muhammed Ibrahim v Maharunissa AIR 2006 Kant 261.

69. AIR 1971 Ker 261.

70. Mahmood T. Religion Law & Society 305. Universal Law Publ ishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. 2013.

71. Shayara Bano v. Union of India. AIR 2017 SC 4607.

72. Nazeer v. Shemeena. 2016 (1) JKJ 312.

73. Mahmood T. Womanhood in Islam. In: Bhatia HS. Studies in Islamic Law, Religion and Society 354. Deep & Deep Publications. 1989.

74. Mohammed Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum. AIR 1985 SC 945.

75. AIR 2017 SC 4607.

76. The Constitution of India, Art. 123.

77. SC refu ses to e ntertain petitions challenging triple talaq ordinance, available at : https://www.livelaw.in/sc - refuses-to-entertain-petition-challenging- triple-talaq-ordinance (Visited on Dec 30, 2018).

78. The Constitution of India, Art. 123.

79. Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer. Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 46. Eastern Book Co., Lucknow . 1987.

80. ILR (2007) 2 Del 1329.

81. Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer. Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 53. Eastern Book Co., Lucknow . 1987.

82. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) 10 SCC 1; Indian Young Lawyers Association & Ors. v. The State of Kerala & Ors. , Writ Petition (civil) No. 373 of 2006; Joseph Shine v. Union of India, Writ petition (criminal) No. 194 of 2017.

83. Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer. Muslim Women (Protection of R ights on Divorce) Act, 1986 52. Eastern Book Co., Lucknow . 1987. Cite this Article Isha Kapoor, Jai Saini, From Shah Bano to Shayara Bano: Developing the Rights of Muslim Women . Journal of Family & Adoption Law. 2018; 1(1): 18–30p.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-12