Efficacy of Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism with Respect to Matters Pertaining to Child Custody: An Overview
Keywords:
Child custody, Personal law, Alternate dispute resolution, Family mattersAbstract
India is a sovereign, socialist, secular and democratic republic country wherein the citizens are not governed by any single personal law. The citizens possess the freedom to practice and preach their own religious values and faith and to also abide by their own personal norms and traditions. Given such a rich and diverse population with different geographical attributes, it becomes difficult at times to resolve the disputes arising out of the private sphere i.e. within a family or between spouses especially when it relates to their child. It is observed that the decision-making process with respect to family laws including matters like divorce, maintenance, custody of children, etc. involves a plethora of selfadjudicatory mechanisms such as mediation, conciliation and settlement which aid and facilitate the aggrieved parties and the adjudicators to reach a desired result. Over the past few years, the application of the rules of ADR and their applicability to such situations has raised a series of questions
concerning the custody of children and their welfare. Based on the following approach, the research paper explores the nuances of the applicability of these alternate dispute resolution mechanisms in reallife cases related to child custody and analyses the various struggles faced by the parties while undergoing such forms of alternate dispute resolution mechanisms for resolving their disputes. The research paper proposes the outlook of humans as change agents instead of sufferers, and to that end examines the alternate dispute resolution mechanism in contrast to the Indian legal provisions especially in India for the necessity of observance of peaceful settlement of disputes in matrimonial cases.
References
1. Section 26, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
2. Section 49, Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936.
3. Perminder Lal v. Suman, AIR 1984 MP 1.
4. Ghessi v. Shriram, AIR 1972 Raj 256.
5. Cohea Dori. Making alternative dispute resolution (ADR) less alternative: The need for ADR as both a mandatory continuing legal education requirement and a bar exam topic . Family Court Review. 2006; 44(4): 640–657.
6. Malhotra A, Malhotra R. Alternative dispute resolution in Indian family law: Realities, practicalities and necessities. https://www.iafl.com/media/1129/alternative_dispute_resolution_in_indian_ family_law.pdf.
7. Goldberg et al. Dispute resolution: Negotiation, mediation, and other processes. 5th edn. 107, Aspen Publishers; 2007.
8. Black HC. Garner Black’s Law Dictionary. 9th edn. St. Paul, Minn.: Thomson Reuters; 2009.
9. Mauro Rubino-Sammartano. International Arbitration Law and Practice 13. 2nd edn. New Delhi: Wolters Kluwer (India) Pvt Ltd; 2007.
10. Krishna Sarma et al. Development and practice of arbitration in India—Has it evolved as an effective legal institution. Stanford, CA: Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law, Stanford Univ.; Oct 2009.
11. OP Malhotra, Indu Malhotra. The Law and Practice of Arbitration and Conciliation. 2nd edn. Lexis Nexis; 2006.
12. Supra note 8.
13. Ashwini Kumar Bansal. Arbitration and ADR 19. New Delhi: Universal Law Publishing Co.; 2007.
14. Verma D, Banwari A, Pande N. Online Dispute Resolution. Digital Communication Management [Internet]. 2018 Sep 19 [cited 2023 Apr 18]; Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/ chapters/61440.
15. Vini Singh. Compulsory mediation for family disputes? The Indian Arbitrator. Sept. 2010; 2(9): 1–
16. Section 4(4)(a), The Family Courts Act, 1984.
17. Section 9, The Family Courts Act, 1984.
18. AIR 2009 SC 557.
19. Rajesh Kumar Saxena v. Nidhi Saxena, 1995(1) HLR 472.
20. (2009) 3 SCC 448.
21. Indiankanoon.org. (2015).Report No.257. On ‘reforms in guardianship and custody laws in India’. Available at: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/116184888/.
22. JT 2008(8) SC 521.
23. K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa, 2013.
24. Section 13, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956.
