Reassessing Gender Equality: A Critical Analysis of Gender Bias and Asymmetry in Indian Statutory Frameworks

Authors

  • R Ramesh Nadar PhD Research Scholar, Department of Law, ICFAI Foundation for Higher Education (IFHE) University, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

Keywords:

Gender Equality, Gender Bias, Gender Asymmetry, Substantive Equality, Constitutional Law, Article 14, Article 15, Gender Justice, Protective Discrimination, Legal Reform.

Abstract

The constitutional commitment to equality and non-discrimination forms the foundation of India’s legal framework. Articles 14, 15 and 16 of the Constitution guarantee equality before the law, prohibit discrimination on specified grounds, and promote equal opportunity. Several Indian statutory frameworks continue to adopt gender-specific classifications, differential standards, and protective measures that raise important questions regarding gender neutrality, constitutional justification, and the evolving understanding of gender justice. This research seeks to critically examine gender-based asymmetries embedded in Indian legislation and their compatibility with constitutional principles of equality, dignity and non-discrimination. The study proposes to analyse whether gender-specific statutory provisions constitute legitimate protective discrimination aimed at addressing historical and structural inequalities or, in certain circumstances, perpetuate stereotypes and unequal treatment. It also examines the extent to which laws framed predominantly around women’s protection adequately address instances where men or persons of diverse gender identities may experience legal disadvantage. The research argues that gender justice cannot be achieved merely through gender-specific protection or formal equality before the law. The study seeks to identify areas where statutory reform may be necessary to make Indian laws more gender-sensitive, rights-oriented and substantively equal, while preserving legitimate measures designed to remedy historical disadvantage. Ultimately, the research aims to contribute to the development of a more balanced and inclusive conception of gender justice within the Indian constitutional framework.

References

1. https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Headquarters/Attachments/Sections/Library/Publications/2018/Towards-a-gender-responsive-implementation-of-UN-Convention-to-Combat-Desertification-en.pdf

2. Joseph Tussman and Jacobus Tenbroek, 'The Equal Protection of the Laws' (1949) 37 Calif L Rev 341; see also Haragopal Reddy, 'Equality Doctrine and the Indian Constitution' (1982) 45 Andhra Law Times 57, 58 ['All persons are to be treated alike. except where circumstances require different treatment']

3. Rashid, Mohammad. (2025). TOWARDS GENDER-NEUTRAL LAWS: ADDRESSING BIASES IN THE INDIAN LEGAL FRAMEWORK. CC The Journal. 6. 2712-2720.

4. Ibid

5. Ratna Kapur and Brenda Cossman, "On Women, Equality and the Constitution: Through the Looking Glass of Feminism Ratna Kapur and Brenda Gossman" (2022) 16(1) National Law School Journal 10.55496/RKBC6573

6. Ratna Kapur and Brenda Cossman, "On Women, Equality and the Constitution: Through the Looking Glass of Feminism Ratna Kapur and Brenda Gossman" (2022) 16(1) National Law School Journal 10.55496/RKBC6573

7. Sandra Fredman, Substantive equality revisited, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Volume 14, Issue 3, July 2016, Pages 712–738, https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mow043

8. V. S. Elizabeth. (2004). GENDER JUSTICE IN THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Journal of Dharma, 29(2), 209–220. Retrieved from https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/741

9. THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023

10. THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023

11. THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023

12. Ibid

13. Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005

14. Hiral P. Harsora and Ors. Vs. Respondent: Kusum Narottamdas Harsora and Ors , MANU/SC/1269/2016.

15. Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act 2013

16. Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956

17. 18 U.S. Code § 2242 - Sexual abuse

18. Sexual Offences Act 2003 of U.K

19. Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46)

20. CRIMES ACT 1900 - SECT 61I of New South Wales

21. 18 U.S. Code § 2242 - Sexual abuse

22. Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46)

23. https://www.aihw.gov.au/family-domestic-and-sexual-violence/understanding-fdsv/consent?utm_source

24. 18 U.S. Code § 1801 - Video voyeurism

25. 18 U.S. Code § 2261A – Stalking

26. Sexual Offences Act 2003 of U.K

27. Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46)

28. Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46)

29. CRIMES ACT 1900 - SECT 61I of New South Wales

30. Domestic Abuse Act 2021 of United Kingdom

31. Protecting Victims Act (S.C. 2026, c. 19) of Canada

32. Section 4AB of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) of Australia

33. Gupta, D., Gupta, M. (2026). Gender-Neutral Laws in India Regarding Sexual Offences. International Journal of Law Management & Humanities, 9(IV), 202-213. https://ijlmh.com/article/view/gender-neutral-laws-in-india-regarding-sexual-offences

34. AVNI BHATIA, GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN INDIAN LAW: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF LEGAL PROTECTIONS FOR MEN, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 5 (14) OF 2025, PG. 458-468, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344. DOI – https://doi.org/10.65393/OFKC4097

35. Sharma, Khushi, Reassessing the POSH Framework: The Case for Gender-Neutral Workplace Sexual Harassment Law in India (April 17, 2026). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6597898 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6597898

36. S, Ragha Sudhan, Gender Bias and Maintenance Laws in India (January 2, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4316231 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4316231

37. Madsen, D. H., & Agustín, L. R. (2018). Gender Mainstreaming in the Danish Central Administration: (Mis)understandings of the Gendered Impact of Law Proposals. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning, 26(4), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v26i4.110557

38. Handbook on Combating Gender Stereotypes (Supreme court of India)

39. Gender sensitive parliaments and the legislative cycle: conceptualising new cultures and practices. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2147760

Published

2026-11-10

How to Cite

Reassessing Gender Equality: A Critical Analysis of Gender Bias and Asymmetry in Indian Statutory Frameworks. (2026). Journal of Constitutional Law and Jurisprudence, 10(1). https://lawjournals.celnet.in/index.php/Jolj/article/view/2214