Law and Juvenile Delinquency: Responsibility and a New Opportunity
Keywords:
Juvenile delinquency, The system of juvenile justice, Responsibility under the law, Rehabilitation,Justice that heal,Policies that give people a second opportunity, Stopping people from committing crimes againAbstract
This essay examines the intricate relationship between law and juvenile delinquency, highlighting the equilibrium between ensuring accountability for young offenders and facilitating rehabilitation possibilities. It looks at the laws that regulate juvenile justice and points out the differences between punishment and rehabilitation. Using case studies and recent research, the article looks at how social, psychological, and family factors affect delinquent behaviour. It also investigates how well diversion
programs, restorative justice efforts, and second-chance policies work to lower recidivism and help young people grow in a constructive way. The paper contends that a sophisticated legislative framework – one that maintains responsibility while emphasising rehabilitation – can reform the juvenile justice system into a structure that not only deters criminal behaviour but also fosters social reintegration and individual development.
References
1. Troutman B. A More Just System of Juvenile Justice: Establishing a New Standard of Accountability for Juveniles in Illinois, 108 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 197 (2018). https:// scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol108/iss1/5.
2. E. T. and S. Scott Grisso. “The Evolution of Adolescence: A Developmental Perspective on Juvenile Justice Reform.” The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 1997.
3. Reilly J. “Risk and Protective Factors of Delinquency: Perspectives from Professionals Working with Youth.” 2012. https://researchonline.stthomas.edu.
4. Scott ES, Steinberg L. Social Welfare and Fairness in Juvenile Crime Regulation, 71 La. L. Rev. 35 (2010). You may find it at https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/733.
5. Northrop CM, Rozan KR. “Kids Will be Kids: Time for a Reasonable Child Standard for the Proof of Objective Mens Rea Elements.” Maine Law Review. 2017;69(1):109.
6. Brank, Eve M. Lane, Jodi, and “Punishing My Parents: Juveniles’ Perspectives on Parental Responsibility.” Department of Psychology Faculty Publications; 2008. 386. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychfacpub/386.
7. Scott ES. “Adolescence and the Regulation of Youth Crime,” 2007. https://www.researchgate.net/.
8. Garcia SA, Drogin E, Batey R, Spana RE. “Institutionalised Delinquent and Maladjusted Juveniles: A Psycholegal Systems Analysis.” 1989. https://fileserver-az.core.ac.uk/.
9. Malizio J. “Access Denied: Sexual Victimization of Juveniles in Correctional Facilities - How Senate Bill 585 Could Have Helped.” 2010. https://scholarship.richmond.edu/.
10. Ascani N. “Labeling Theory and the Effects of Sanctioning on Delinquent Peer Association: A New Approach to Sentencing Juveniles,” Perspectives. 2012;4:Article 10. Available at: https://scholars. unh.edu/perspectives/vol4/iss1/10.
11. T. M. Funk, A Mere Youthful Indiscretion? Reexamining the Policy of Expunging Juvenile Delinquency Records, 29 U. Mich.J. L. Reform 885 (1996). Available at: https://repository.law. umich.edu/mjlr/vol29/iss4/2.
12. Silva LR. The Best Interest Is the Child: A Historical Philosophy for Modern Issues, 28 BYU J. Pub. L. 415 (2014). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/jpl/vol28/iss2/5.
13. Blankley KM, Jimenez AC. Restorative Justice and Youth Offenders in Nebraska, 98 Neb. L. Rev. 1 (2019). Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol98/iss1/2.
14. Bazian SJ. “Reconciling the Sex Offender Registration Act and the Family Court Act: Why the New York Legislature Should Allow Consideration of Prior Juvenile Delinquency Adjudications in Sora Risk Level Determinations.” 2015. https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/.
