Custodial Violence and Accountability Mechanisms as Human Right
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37591/jclj.v8i2.1902Keywords:
Custodial Violence, Human Rights, Police Reform, National Human Rights Commission, Democratic AccountabilityAbstract
The high rate of custodial violence is one of the most alarming human rights questions in contemporary India, which gives an indicator of the severe democratic governance and citizen well-being issues. The paper discusses this issue in detail with respect to the scenario of physical and psychological abuse that takes place within police custody. It follows the institutional and historical origins of the issue lighting up on the reasons perpetuating such practices against the protection of laws. The paper relies on principles established in international rights including convention concepts that were established in the United Nations Charter to advocate the unified and dedicated appeal. It requires the involvement of the government, civil society and institutional organs to end custodial violence and enhance accountability. Another significant structural problem that the paper has outlined in the Indian system
of policing is that of the dire need of reforming the policing system to adhere to the values of the constitution and human dignity. The problem of national institutions, especially Human Rights Cells and the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), is raised in a very critical sense, especially in the areas of monitoring, investigation, and justice ensuring in the instances of custodial deaths as well
as notorious misdoings. Finally, the paper notes that creating an open regulatory system that respects rights through the building of a transparent and rights-respecting policing culture is vital when protecting the rule of law and democratic integrity.
References
1. Sato S. The contemporary human rights situation in Pakistan: challenges, violations, and prospects for reform [Internet]. 2025 May 15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.172971566.60879681/v2.
2. Mia B. Custodial torture: laws and practice in Bangladesh. Electron Res J Soc Sci Humanit. 2020;2(2):232–246.
3. Reji J. Custodial torture: analyzing the impact of DK Basu vs. State of West Bengal. Int J Sci Res [Internet]. 2023 Aug 5;12(8):658–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21275/sr23803175117.
4. Paul S. Custodial justice-a study on police brutality in India from victimological perspective. Academic Guru Publishing House; 2024 Jun 28.
5. Ross DL. Custodial deaths in detention. In: Routledge eBooks [Internet]. 2017. p. 272-84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560953-14.
6. Social justice issues examined. In: IGI Global eBooks [Internet]. 2023. p. 188-208. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9304-2.ch007.
7. Nail I, Nazim M. Custody: law enforcement issues and human rights protection. Deleted Journal [Internet]. 2024 May 29;(16.3):81–95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.3.81.95.
8. Weiner MH. Convention on safety for survivors of family violence involved in international custody disputes. SSRN Electron J [Internet]. 2025 Jan 1. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5228298.
9. Schneider CL. Police abuse and the racialized boundaries of citizenship in France. In: Springer eBooks [Internet]. 2018. p. 31–53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72883-4_2.
10. Seri G, Lokaneeta J. Police as state: governing citizenship through violence. In: Springer eBooks [Internet]. 2018. p. 55–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72883-4_3.
11. Van Hout MC, Fleißner S, Stöver H. #Me Too: global progress in tackling continued custodial violence against women: the 10-year anniversary of the Bangkok Rules. Trauma Violence Abuse [Internet]. 2021 Aug 3;24(2):515–29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211036067.
12. Aston JN. Torture behind bars [Internet]. Oxford University Press eBooks. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190120986.001.0001.
