Rare Disease Dilemma–Government Progress in Cost Effectiveness and Research Tools

Authors

  • Somasundararajan B.

Keywords:

Health science, orphan drugs, rare disease, research tool, cost effectiveness

Abstract

Rare disease – unheard and unnoticed struggle by the people in India. The term “Rare disease has been defined by World Health Organization (WHO) is a disease or disorder that is prevalence in 1 or less in 1000 people. However, due to the country’s specific requirements, each country has its own definition. For ex: In the European Union, a disease is defined as rare when it affects fewer than 1 in 2,000 people (5 in 10,000 people). Similarly, in US, rare diseases are defined as a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 patients in the country (6.4 in 10,000 people). However, in that note still India is looking to define the term. This is due to the lack of epidemiological data of the number of persons affected with the rare disease in India. Though Indian Government raise fund through different schemes and policy to treat the patients with rare disease, this step cannot reduce the patients affected with such
type of disease in future. The good step should not only support the current situation but also needs to protect the future cause which may arise. This paper discusses public awareness of the term 'rare disease' and how government actions in various ways can reduce the death toll among patients affected by rare diseases. Nevertheless, the paper also discusses the role of government particularly in cost effectiveness of drug and setting up of research tools which will be an additional boost to the medical facilities in India.

References

Viswanath Pingali & Neelima Das, Rare Diseases Require Support Too, 46 VIKALPA 129 (2021).

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, National Policy for Treatment Of Rare Diseases, 2021, NPRD FINAL .docx (mohfw.gov.in) ( Last visited April 15,2023)

Id.at 2.

Spotlight on rare diseases, Volume 7, The lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, Issue 2, P75, 2019, Spotlight on rare diseases - The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology.

Id.at.2

Prasanna Kumar B Shirol, Challenges and opportunities for rare diseases in India, Economic Times Healthworld, April 28, 2023, Progeria awareness in India (indiatimes.com).

Dr. N. V. Paranjape, Studies in Jurisprudence & Legal Theory, 25.

Vanimanoraj, Bentham’s Utilitarianism: Theory, Scope & Criticisms, Desire, Nov. 3, 2019, Bentham's Utilitarianism: Theory, Scope & Criticisms - Legal Desire Media and Insights.

Dr. N. V. Paranjape, Studies in Jurisprudence & Legal Theory, 41-43

Erich Voegelin, Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law, 42, No. 2, JSTOR, 268-276, Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law on JSTOR.

Allyn L. Taylor, Global Health Law: International Law and Public Health Policy, INT. ENCYCL. PUBLIC HEAL. 268 (2016).

INDIA CONST. art. 21.

State Of Punjab and Others v. Mohinder Singh Chawla [1997] AIR SC [1225]

Consumer Education and Research Centre v. Union of India AIR 922, 1995 SCC (3) 42.

United Declaration of Human Rights. Article 25. cl.1.

India const. art. 38

India Const. art. 39

India Const. art. 47

ICMR, National Policy for Rare Disease,2021, Final NPRD, 2021.pdf (mohfw.gov.in). 20. Mohd. Ahmed (Minor) Vs Union of India & Others, (2014) DLT 208 199

Supra.at.16.

Lysosomal Storage Disorders Support Society Vs State of Karnataka, (2022) KAR HC.

Supra.at.18.

Live law, Kerala High Court Issues Directions To Regulate Crowd Funding For Treatment Of Rare Diseases (livelaw.in), (Last Visited, April 16,2023).

The WIRE, Delhi High Court Urges State Governments to Step up on Handling Rare Diseases (thewire.in), ( Last Visited, April 16,2023).

The NEW INDIAN EXPRESS, Child with rare disease treated at AIIMS- The New Indian Express, (Last Visited, April 16,2023).

Samanth Parker & Stephen Lynn, Challenges, strategies and lessons learned for the setting up and running of a European Reference Network for rare diseases,159, Rare DIS. CHALLENGES OPPOR. SOC. ENTREP, 2017, Managing research advances into a rare disease, 10 Available at (taylorfrancis.com).

Mohua Chakraborty Choudhury & Gayatri Saberwal, The role of patient organizations in the rare disease ecosystem in India: An interview based study, 14 ORPHANET J. RARE DIS. 1 (2019).

D. Julkowska et al., The Importance of International Collaboration for Rare diseases research: A European perspective, 24, GENE THER., 562-571, 2017, The importance of international collaboration for rare diseases research: a European perspective (nature.com).

Koichi Mikami, Orphans in the Market: The History of Orphan Drug Policy, 32. SOC. HIST. MED, 609-630, 2019, Orphans in the Market: The History of Orphan Drug Policy | Social History of Medicine | Oxford Academic (oup.com).

Swann J, The Story Behind the Orphan Drug Act, FDA, 2018, https://www.fda.gov/industry/fdas-rare-disease-day/story-behind-orphan-drug-act (last visited Nov 12, 2022).

Supra. at. 27.

Enrique Seoane - Vazquez et al., Incentives for orphan drug research and development in the United States, Vol 3, ORPHANET J. RARE DIS, 2008, 1750-1172-3-33.pdf (springer.com).

Oliver Wellman-Labadie & Youwen Zhou, The US Orphan Drug Act: Rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity?, 95, HEALTH POLICY( NEW.YORK), 216-226, 2010, The US Orphan Drug Act: Rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity? - ScienceDirect.

Comparison: Indian and United States, NIAID ClinRegs, Clinical Research Regulation for India and United States | ClinRegs (nih.gov).

The Times of India, 6 states have more doctors than WHO’s 1:1,000 guideline, 2018, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/65640694.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst. 37. Johanna Deeksha, India’s policy for rare diseases is no help to parents fighting for their children’s lives, QUARTZ, 2022, India's rare disease policy is little help to children or parents (qz.com).

Published

2023-06-15

How to Cite

Somasundararajan B. (2023). Rare Disease Dilemma–Government Progress in Cost Effectiveness and Research Tools. Indian Journal of Health and Medical Law, 6(2), 1–11. Retrieved from https://lawjournals.celnet.in/index.php/ijhml/article/view/1280