Reservation in India Within Constitutional Ambit: An Overview
Keywords:
Inequality, reservation, Republic of India, backward class, constitutional statusAbstract
Inequality is widely pervasive and deeply embedded in the Indian society with explicit manifestations in the socio-economic and political life of a large section of people on account of the normative structure of the Indian society. The constituent assembly constituted to frame the constitution of the Republic of India seriously deliberated on the issue, and resolved to adopt ‘reservation’ as an effective mechanism to address the issue of inequality. Reservation was considered a form of affirmative action to uplift the living conditions of the hitherto excluded and disadvantageously placed backward class of people who have been historically oppressed and denied of basic human dignity and equal opportunity. It was accorded constitutional status with provisions for representation of the underprivileged people in the parliament and state assemblies of the country, and their employment in the government controlled economic enterprises in fixed percentage. Reservation, as evidence suggests, has been instrumental, and has certainly played a very significant role in the uplift of the living conditions of the hitherto excluded communities. But at the same time, it has also limited its scope, and kept away a large number of people in waiting on account of debatable criterion adopted in identification of the genuine and deserving groups and households. It is found that the first group of beneficiaries having availed of reservation benefits have established their monopoly at the cost of the remaining vulnerable groups who are left with no alternative other than to wait indefinitely because of non-pragmatism practised in implementation of the policy of reservation and in practical identification of the needy people. It is suggested that an institution with judicial power be created at the national level to meticulously prepare the group(s) of needy people for reservation, and closely monitor its implementation in letter and spirit of the constitutional provisions.
References
1. Agawal RC. Constitutional development and national movement of India. New Delhi: S. Chand and Company publications; 2005. p. 599.
2. Banerjee R, Bhagat PK. Reservation system in India. Int J Acad Res Dev. 2018;3(3).
3. Haokip S. Reservation policy in India: the Prac tice of Reservation policy on Education in India. J Emerg Technol Innov Res. 2019;6(5).
4. Janger SK. Reservation policy and Indian constitution in India. American International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences. 2013.
5. Joshi KC. The Constitutional law of India. Cent Law publishers. 2016.
6. Kumar S. Social justice and the Politics of Reservation in India. New Delhi: A Mittal Publications; 2008. p. 70.
7. Kumar TA, Tripathi M. Indian political and Reservation Policy. New Delhi: Omega Publication; 2012. p. 71.
8. Kumar SK V. Social Justice and the politics of Reservation in India. New Delhi: A Mittal Publication; 2008. p. 62.
9. Laxmikanth M. Indian polity for civil service examinations. McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. 2017.
10. Nityanath S, Melkari SP. Reservation policy in India and development of its implement. Int J Adv Educ Res. 2017;2(3).
11. Narang AS. Indian government and politics. New Delhi: Gitanjali publishing House; 2000. p. 560.
12. Pandey JN. The constitutional law of India. Central Law Agency; 2009.
13. Tripathi AK. Indian politics and reservation policy. New Delhi: Omega publication; 2012. p. 121.
14. Tyagi R. Government and politics in India. Noida: Mayur Paperbacks publications; 2012. p. 10.
15. Upadhyay HC. Reservation for sch edule caste and schedule tribes. New Delhi: Anmol Publications; 2010. p. 3.
