The Right to Self-Determination by Groups Struggling for Statehood in Post-Colonial Africa: A Constitutional Freedom or Battle?
Keywords:
Analysis, Rights, Self-Determination, Groups, Statehood, Post-Colonial, CameroonAbstract
Just when it is thought that some peace is settling in Africa after the scourge of the 2nd World War, there have been raging internal conflicts with groups of people within territorial boundaries of states, claiming self-rule (Self-Determination). Many conflicts around the globe generated from attempts at fractioning states. In Africa alone, there are a handful like the Biafran of Nigeria, Saharawian of Western Sahara, Katangans of Congo and the Ambazonian in Cameroon. The right to self-determination has become one of the most complex issues for African policy makers, scholars and the international community at large. Confusion surrounding the content of the right to self-determination makes people to ask whether there exists a right to self-determination. This is because this right is constitutional and is also included in international human rights conventions which fail to defined who exactly is to claim such right; a group; a people; or a nation, and what exactly this right confesses. At the same time, the international system particularly in the post-colonial era has defended the inviolability of existing national/state borders, regardless of how and when they were determined. In recent years, many groups that constitute minorities in their states have evoked the “right to self-determination” in their demands for autonomy or in some case, have resorted to violence to pursue their aims. These groups typically demand for self-determination as a way to end years of repression and human rights violations by the majority ethnic groups or the central government. Based on the challenges faced in asserting the right to self-determination, the objectives of this paper is therefore, to assess and analyze the content of the right to self-determination, evaluate the level of its acceptability and applicability, examine its assertion by groups claiming it, and examine if there exist other means of asserting such right. To attend these objectives, we adopted the doctrinal method and discovered that they are other means of asserting the right which can be through Federalism, confederation, Decentralization and not only through secession to which if they are effectively implemented, such right will be assured and sustainable as such, enhance peace and security in Africa.
References
1. Jenny Nguyen: Whose Self - determination? (A Critical Examination on the right to Self -determination and its role during the process of decolonization), Master of Law programme faculty of law lund university, 2016, page 8.
2. 56 Congressional Records at 8671 (Feb. 11, 1918).
3. See generally Quincy wright, mandates under the League of Nations (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press 1930); R. N. Chowdhuri, International mandates and Trusteeship Systems: A Comparative study (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1955).
4. Report of th e International Committee of Jurists entrusted by the Council of the League of Nations with the task of giving an advisory opinion upon the Legal aspects of the Aland Islands question, League of Nations off. J; Spec. Supp. No. 3 (Oct, 1920) p 5.
5. The Aland Islands Questions, Report presented to the Council of the League of Nations by the commission of Rapporteurs, League of Nations Doc. B. 7. 21/68/106 (1921) p 27.
6. Ibid. at 28.
7. Ibid. United Nation Charter, arts. 1 (2), 55. Curiously, However, the French text of the Charter does refer to respect for the “right” of Self -determination, the “Principle de l’egalite des droits de people et leurdroit a disposer d’eux -mêmes” (Literally, the “Principle of equality of the rights of peoples and their right to dispo se of themselves”).
8. UN G. A. Res 1541 (14 Dec. 1960).
9. Patricia Carley: Self - Determination Sovereignty, Territorial Integrity, and the Right to Secession Report for a round table held in conjunction with the US Department of State’s Policy planning staff. Page (V).
10. Hannun, Hurst, Rethinking Self - - determination, (McCorquodale edit), 2000, P; 205.
11. Hannun even laid emphasis rhetorically on the number of times the term self - determination is used in the Charter stating for instance that the term is mentioned “only twice”
12. The Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Counties and people.
13. Partricia Carley: Self -Determination sovereignty, Territorial Integrity, and the Right to secession (Report f rom a Roundtable Held in conjunction with The U.S. Department of State’s Policy Planning STAFF) United State Institute for Peace. p v.
14. Oxford Public International Law published under the auspices of the Max Plank Foundation for International Peace and the Role of Law under the direction of Rudiger Wolfrum (oxford edit)2010.
15. http://www.britannica.com/topic/self- determination.
16. Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary: Special Price Edition p 526.
17. Ibid p 1186.
18. Ibid p 1165.
19. Brownlie, Ian, Public International L aw, New York 2003, p 555.
20. Bring 2002 p 202 –203.cited in Maya Abdullah (2006) p 33.
21. Raic, David: Statehood and the law of Self-determination, Kluwer law international, The Hague (2000) p 230 – 233.
22. See note 18 in Bring, 2000 p 202. In Maya Abdullah p34.
23. Article 3 in the Charter of OAS.
24. The Helsinki Final Act of 1975 following the conference on security and corporation in European. See Articles I -II, IV and VI where the principles of sovereign equality, non-intervention, territorial integri ty etc. are affirmed and Article VIII in which the right to self-determination is affirmed.
25. Bring 2000 p 107 –108. In Maya (2006) p35.
26. Maya Abdullah: The Right of self - determination in International Law , Master Theses Public International Law, University of Goteborg May 2006 p25.
27. Military and Paramilitary Activities in and The Right to Self-Determination by Groups Struggling Nkongho and Samba JCLJ (2020) 109–131 © Law Journals 2020. All Rights Reserved Page 130 against Nicaragua (Nicaragua V. United States of America, Judgement 27 June 1986, the ICJ Report 1986, p 14.
28. The Preamble in the General Assembly Declaration on Principles of Internat ional Law concerning friendly relation and co - operation among states in accordance with the Charter of the United Nation (1970); GA Resolution 2625 (XXV).
29. The General Assembly Resolution 626 (VII) on the right to exploit freely natural wealth and resources 1952.
30. The General Assembly Resolution 1803 (XVII) on permanent over natural resources, 1962.
31. The Declaration on the establishment of a New International Economic Order, General Assembly Resolution 3201, 1974.
32. The Charter of Economic Right and Duties of St ates, General Assembly Resolution 3281 (XXIX), 1974.
33. Brownlie, 2003 p 14–15.
34. Brownlie, 2003 p 518
35. Cassese, Antonio, Self -determination of people–A Legal Reappraisal, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 1995, p 44.
36. Hurst Hannun, Autonomy sovereign ty, and self -determination: The Accommodation of conflict, rights (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996), p41-42.
37. Ibid p 45–46
38. Maya Abdullah:(2006) p26
39. Cassese, Antonio (1995) p 46–47.
40. Raic, 2002 p 217 in Castellino. International law and self -determination: The interplay of the politics of territorial possession with formulations with post - colonial “Nation” identity (The Hage: Matinus Njihoff publisher,2000).30
41. Bring, 2000 p 129, see page 8 of Maya Abdullah (The Right of Self - Determination in International Law).
42. Maya (2006), p10.
43. Joshua Castilino, International Law and self-determination: The Interplay of the politics of territorial possession with formulations with post -colonial “Nations” identity (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff publishers, 2000). P 27.
44. Joshua Castilino, International Law and self-determination: The interplay of the politics of territorial possession with formulations of post -colonial “Nation” identity (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff publishers, 2000) p 29
45. Article 1 in the ICCPR and the ICESCR.
46. Heather A. Wilson, International Law and the use of force by National Liberation Movement (New York: Oxford University Press) p 75.
47. Castilino p 31
48. Jennings’ Opinions as cited by Castilino (opcit) (See the following footnote at p 31.)
49. Castilino p 32.
50. Ibid p 32–33.
51. Hurst Hannun, Autonomy Sovereignty, and self -determination: The Accommodation of conflicting rights (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996), p 41–42.
52. William Twining (Issues of Self - determination) Aberdeen University Press 1991 p 55.
53. Jama. Self-Determination in Africa: A Case Study of Somalia. Master Thesis in International Conflict Management of the University of Nairobi (2012) p 36
54. African Charter on Human and People’s Rights. Article 20 (I).
55. Law N°2008/001 of 14 April 2008 to amend and supplement some provisions of law N° 96/6 of 18 January 1996 to amend the Constitution of 2 June 1972.
56. Nigerian Constitution of 1999.
57. Turkish Constitution of 1980.
58. Cameroon Constitution of 2008.
59. Turkish Constitution
60. Namibia (Namibia V; South Africa) Judgement of the ICJ.
61. East Timor (Portugal V. Australia) Judgement of the ICJ 30 June 1995, Reports 1995 p 90.
62. Communication 75/92, Katanga Peo ple’s Congress V. Zaire.
63. Nchuto Veraline: The African System of JCLJ (2020) 109–131 © Law Journals 2020. All Rights Reserved Page 131 Human Right. Course in Masters 2 Professional (Human Right) Academic Year 2017/2018 p 10.
64. The Concept of People’s Right was actually developed in the colonial context by the Third World Advocat es (See below and was never of great interest for Western Jurists. However, the Post -Cold War era of Self -determination that has caught the attention of Western Commentators Could, according to Crawford (see p 21 in Alston, 2001) breathe new life into the idea of people’s rights in Maya Abdullah (2006) p45.
65. Crawford: The Creation of State in International Law. Oxford. Oxford University Press (2000) p. 215.
66. Article 1 (2) of the UN Charter.
67. Articles 1 of ICCPR and ICESCR.
68. Article 2 of the International Declaration on the granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples.
69. Yoran, D., (1976 ) in Maya Abdullah: The Right of self -determination in International Law. Master Thesis in Public International Law. University of Guteborg May 2006 p 60.
70. Brownlie (1985: 104) in An -Na’Im: Self Determination and Unity: The Case of Sudan (1996) p 8.
71. An-Na’IM(1996)
72. Richard Kiwanutka (1988:88) in An - Na’Im: Self-Determination and Unity: The Case of Sudan (1996) p 7.
73. An-Na’Im: Self-Determination an d Unity: The Case of Sudan. (1996) p 12.
74. Maya Abdullah: The Right of Self - Determination in International Law. Master Thesis Public International Law. University of Goteborg May 2006 p 63
75. An-Na’Im: Self-Determination and Unity: The Case of Sudan (1996) p 112.
76. CRTV Press Hour Sunday Nov. 2017
77. Charles NACH MBACK. La décentralisation en Afrique…article précité p 98
78. Dele Olowu. Evaluation des politiques de la décentralisation en Afrique dans les années 90. Revue Française d’administration Publique N° 88 Oct -Dec 1998 PP. 517–528.
79. Aliyou, S. Cour de la Coopérationdécentralisée. Masters 2 Course Public Law (2017-2018) p 2
80. Decree No 2011/1116/PM of 26 th April 2011 on the Modalities of Decentralised Cooperation.
81. Aliyou, S. OP. Cit p.43.
82. Law N° -2004 on the orientation of decentralization in Cameroon.
83. Ibid. Cite this Article Ayuk Macbert Nkongho, Kimbi Leonard Samba. The Right to Self -Determination by Groups Struggling for Statehood in Post-Colonial Africa: A Constitutional Freedom or Battle? . Journal of Constitutional Law and Jurisprudence . 2020; 3(1): 109–131p.
