Refusal to Defend vis-a-vis Right to Legal Representation
Keywords:
Profession ethics, legal representation, special circumstances, natural justice, Article 21, Constitution, Right to Life, circumstances, crime, victim.Abstract
In the world of real lawyers and real clients, "role differentiation" refers to a fiduciary relationship in which the lawyer promises to take all reasonable and lawful means to attain the objectives of the client. Our Constitution guarantees right to representation to every accused regardless of the crime he has committed. However, the refusal to represent by the advocates hampers the Constitutional Protection offered to accused. Professional ethics requires an advocate to take the brief of the clients and defend them with all the skills they posses. However, on the special circumstances an advocate can deny to represent the accused. The circumstances include threat to the society, threat to the victim and societal perspective. When a person is accused of committing a heinous crime bar associations passes resolutions to refrain from representing him however this goes contrary to basic professional ethics. A person shall not be convicted without affording him to present evidences in his defense, denial of such an opportunity will be contrary to principles of natural justice which also forms a part of right to life enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution.
The author in this paper has analyzed the instances in which an advocate can deny to represent the accused apart from analyzing the importance of legal representation.
References
1. Crosby, Mark, the Voice of Flattery Vs Sober Truth: William Godwin, Thomas Paine and the 1792 Trial of Thomas Paine for Sedition, 37 the Review of English Studies, Oxford University Press 49, 47 - 59 (2010).
2. Priyana Dutta, Denial of Representation in Gurgaon (March 20 2020), Https:// Indianexpress.Com/Article/Explained/Kar nataka-Sedition-Case-Bar-Association- Supreme-Court-6303016.
3. Ryan Augustine Pinto Vs State of Haryana and Anr., Crm-M-35002-2017.
4. (2009) 6 Scc 47.
5. Pti, Bci Rules on Professional Standards for Lawyers (March 21 , 2020), Http:// Delhihighcourt.Nic.In/Writereaddata/Uplo ad/Courtrules/Courtrulefile_X09d4f6e.Pdf.
6. Pti, Rules On Professional Ethics (March 19, 2020), Http://Www.Barcouncilofindia. Org/Wp-Content/Uploads/2010/05/Bciru lespartitoiii.Pdf.
7. M.P. Jain And S.N. Jain, Principles of Administrative Law, Lexis Nexis 14 -115 (5th Ed. 2010).
8. Gurmessa N.M, the Right to Representation by Criminal Defense Counsel in Ethiopia: A Critical Analysis, 29 Yale L.J, 438 435–473 (2018).
9. S.P. Sathe, Administrative Law, Lexis Nexis (Nagpur) 234 (7th Ed., 2010).
10. Law Commission of India, 48th Report (Some Questions under the Code of Criminal Procedure), July 1972 (March 22, 2020), Http://Lawcommissionofindia. Nic.In/1-50/Report48.Pdf.
11. Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh V. State of Gujarat, (2004) 4 Scc 158.
12. Shiv Kumar V. Hukam Chand, (1999) 7 Scc 467.
13. Air 2011 Sc 308.
14. Supra Note 6.
15. (2010) 4 Scc 763.
16. (2011) 4 Scc 729.
17. Manika Roy, Arbitrary Action Of Bar Associations – Denial of Justice to the Accused (March 20, 2020) Https:// Theprint.In/Opinion/Lawyers-Boycotting- Accused-Violate-Rights/10335.
18. David Mellinkoff, the Conscience of A Lawyer 157 (3rd Ed. 1973).
19. John Wesley Hall, Jr., Professional Responsibility of the Criminal Lawyer 5 (5th Ed. 1996).
20. William H. Harbaugh, Lawyer's Lawyer: The Life of John W. Davis 199 (3rd Ed. 1973).
21. Supra Note 18 at 157 (Quoting Johnson V. Emerson, L.R. 6 Ex. 329, 367 (1871)).
22. (2004) 6 Scc 78.
23. (2008) 4 Scc 406.
24. Avtar Singh, Interpretation of Statutes, Gurgaon, Lexisnex is Publication, (14th Ed. 2019).
25. Sirsilk Ltd. V Govt. Of Andhra Pradesh, (2003) 3 Scc 57.
26. Sultana Begum V. Premchand Jain, Air 1997 Sc 1006. Refusal to Defend vis-a-vis Right to Legal Representation Agarwal and Dwivedi JCLJ (2020) 60–67 © Law Journals 2020. All Rights Reserved Page 67
27. Charles W. Wolfram, The Good Lawyer, A Lawyer's Duty To Represent Clients, Repugnant And Otherwise 219-22 (5th Ed. 1984).
28. James Graham, the Right of the Accused to Self-Representation before International Criminal Tribunals, 4 the American 726 (2004).
29. Wade and Forsyth, Administrative Law”, London Library Publication (9th Ed. 2011).
30. John Wellsay, Jr., Professional Responsibility of Criminal Lawyer, 297 - 98 (2d Ed. 1996).
31. Lon L. Fuller and John D. Randall, Professional Responsibility: Report of the Joint Conference, 43 A.B.A. J. 1159, 1216 (1958).
32. 366 US 82 (1961).
33. 287 US 45 1932.
34. 327 US 47 1998. Cite this Article Sakshi Agarwal, Praful Dwivedi. Refusal to Defend vis -a-vis Right to Legal Representation. Journal of Constitutional Law and Jurisprudence. 2020; 3(1): 60–67p.
