Quaid-e-Millat Muhammad Ismail Sahib on Reserved Constituencies

Authors

  • Lakshana R NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Keywords:

Reserved Constituency, Electorate, Minority, Majority, Quaid-E-Millat, Constitutional Assembly Debate, Religion, Muslim.

Abstract

The topic of reserved constituencies has been a hotly debated issue before and after the independence of India. Several scholars from various social, economic and cultural backgrounds have diverse opinions on the topic. Those who oppose reservations in electorates argue that such systems merely serve to further deepen the schisms that the Indian society is benighted by. The minorities tend to overwhelmingly favor it since they have experienced the tyranny of the majority during several junctures in the long history of India. Apart from the lessons learnt from historical experience, the thoughts and viewpoints of prescient scholars voiced during the constitutional debates provide a keen insight into the various dimensions in the complex issue of reserved constituencies. The aim of this paper is to understand and analyze the opinions of Muhammad Ismail Sahib, popularly known as Quaid-e-Millat on the issue of reserved constituencies and draw linkages to the issues related to affirmative action in contemporary times.

Author Biography

  • Lakshana R, NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

    Lakshana R

    Student, V Year B.A, LL. B (Hons.)

    NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

References

1. Om Prakash Ralhan, Encyclopedia of Political Parties, vol. 33-50 at 13 (1998).

2. Constituent Assembly Debates (Proceedings), Vol. VII at 831; See also John Dayal, A Matter of Equity: Fre edom of Faith in Secular India 359 (2007).

3. Kiran Deshta, Uniform Civil Code: In Retrospect and Prospect (2002).

4. Constituent Assembly Debates (Proceedings), Vol. I, 9th December 1946.

5. Jayantbhai Manan & Ors. v. State of Gujarat (yet to be reported); See als o Mahesh Langa, Gujarat High Court quashes ordinance on 10 % quota for economically weak among upper castes, The Hindu, August 4th, 2016.

6. Ram Singh & Ors. v. Union of India W.P. (C) No. 274 of 2014.

7. Murari Lal Gupta v. State of Haryana (yet to be reported); See also TNN, Opposition, Jat bodies blame Haryana governmen t, The Times of India, May 27th, 2016.

8. Report of the Advisory Committee on the subject of Minority Rights, Sardar Vallabhai Patel, Chairman, Ad visory Committee on Minorities, 8 th August 1947 (presented on August 27 th, 1947); See also Dr. Rajendra Prasad: Correspondence and Select documents, Vol. 8 at 303 (Valmiki Choudhary ed., 1987).

9. Vidhu Verma, Non -discrimination and Equality in India: Contest ing Boundaries of Social Justice 220 (2012). JCLJ (2019) 15-19 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 19

10. India (Central Government and Legislature) (Amendment) Bill 1946, Constituent Assembly Debates (Proceedings), Vol. VIII, Wednesday, the 25th May 1949. Cite this Article Lakshana R . Quaid-e-Millat Muhammad Ismail Sahib on Reserved Constituencies . Jurisprudence. 2019; 2(1): 15-19p

Downloads

Published

2019-07-12

Issue

Section

The Constitutional Jurisprudence: Concept, influence

How to Cite

Quaid-e-Millat Muhammad Ismail Sahib on Reserved Constituencies. (2019). Journal of Constitutional Law and Jurisprudence, 2(1), 15-19. https://lawjournals.celnet.in/index.php/Jolj/article/view/261