Interesectionality of Law and Sociology: A Comprehensive Research Endeavor

Authors

  • Aishwarya

Keywords:

law and sociology, social institutions, globalization, social control, sociology of law

Abstract

The interdisciplinary field of sociology and law is a growing field that emerged in the earlier half of the twentieth century. Today, the sociology of law has achieved much significance because of the diversity of perspectives and research efforts put into the field. This discipline aims to understand the role of law in society and vice versa. The evolution of the field of sociology and the various perspectives of theorists on the sociology of law have been discussed. Law plays an important role besides legislation in the functioning of several social institutions of society such as politics, culture, economy, etc. to maintain social order. The effects of globalization, which is reaching its zenith in the contemporary world, on law, the idea of global law and global police, and the deformities of such concepts are dealt with in the article.

References

MATHIEU- DEFLEM, SOCIOLOGY OF LAW, 1-7, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).

Id. at 4.

Id. at 4-5.

Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, § 4, No. 28, Acts of Parliament, 1961 (India).

Satbir Singh v. State of Haryana, (2021 SCC Online SC 404).

Deflem, supra note. 18- 20.

Id. at 20.

Cesare Beccaria Classical Theory Explained, Theories and Models, Health Research Funding, (accessed on May 30,

at Cesare Beccaria Classical Theory Explained - HRF (healthresearchfunding.org).

Oxford Advanced American Dictionary, OxfordLearnersDictionaries.com (accessed on May 30, 2023).

Joel Lalengliana Darlong, Herbert Spencer’s Theory of Evolution, SOCIOLOGY LENS (accessed on June 01, 2023).

Oxford Learners Dictionary, OxfordLearnersDictionaries.com (accessed on June 01, 2023).

Herbert Spencer, concept of society, Laissez-Faire, SU LMS, (accessed on June 01, 2023), <SU LMS>.

Deflem, supra note. 32.

Id. at 32.

Heberle, Rudolf., The Sociology of Ferdinand Tönnies, vol. 2, no. 1, American Sociological Review, 9-25, 1937,

JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2084562.

Id. at 36.

Id. at 37-39.

Terje Gronning, Ideal Type, The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory (accessed at June 02, 2023).

Deflem, supra note. 41.

Sandro Serpa, Caros Miguel Ferreira, The Concept of Bureaucracy by Max Weber, International Journal of Social

Science Studies, Vol. 7, No. 2, 13, (March 2019), https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v7i2.3979.

Id, at 14.

Deflem, supra note. 46-47.

Id. at 58.

Patricia Young, The Sociology of Emile Durkheim, Chapter 3- Durkheim’s Methodology, Honors Theses, Paper 291,

UR Scholarship Repository, 12-13, <The sociology of Emile Durkheim (core.ac.uk)>.

Deflem, supra note. 61-62.

Young, supra note. 24- 25.

Id. at 27-28.

Id. at 29-30.

Deflem, supra note. 25-26.

Jonathan Wolff, David Leopold, Karl Marx, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition),

https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/marx/.

Deflem, supra note. 27-29.

Prathyusha Madhu, Social institutions: Definition, Characteristics, Types, Examples, SOCIOLOGY GROUP

(accessed on June 02, 2023), http://sociologygroup.com.

Benno Torgler, The Power of Public Choice in Law and Economics, Journal of Economic Surveys, Volume 36, Issue

, 1410-1453, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joes.12490.

Brian Edgar Butler, Law and Economics, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (accessed on June 02, 2023),

https://iep.utm.edu/law-and-economics.

Deflem, supra note. 150-151.

INDIA CONST. art. 39, cl. d.

Equal Remuneration Act, 1976, § 4, No. 49, Acts of Parliament, 1987 (India).

Deflem, supra note. 151-152.

People Union for Democratic Rights vs Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 1473.

Dr. Miro Cerar, The Relationship Between Law and Politics, Vol 15| Issue 1, Annual Survey of International &

Comparative Law, 23, (2009), http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/annlsurvey/vol15/iss1/3.

Id. at 20-21.

Id. at 33-34.

Paul Schiff Berman, The Enduring Connections Between Law and Culture, Vol.57, No. 101, 2009, American Journal

of Comparative Law, (May 24, 2009), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1409294.

LAWRENCE ROSEN, LAW AS CULTURE: AN INVITATION, 3 rd edition, 4, (Princeton University Press 2008).

Id. at 7.

Rafif Zarea, Law and Culture: Reconceptualization and Case Studies, Volume 5, LAW AND VISUAL

JURISPRUDENCE (LVJ), 2527, 2529 (2022).

Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, AIR 2018 SC 4321.

Indra Sarma v V.K.V. Sarma, AIR 2014 SC 309.

Arms Act, 1959, § 3(1), No. 54, Acts of Parliament, 1959 (India).

Molly Tarunima Tagore, Law and Cultural Conflict: An Analysis, JUS CORPUS LAW JOURNAL, (June 05, 2023),

https://www.juscorpus.com/law-and-cultural-conflict-an-analysis.

Tamar Frankel & Tomasz Braun, Law and Culture, Vol. 101:157 Boston University Law Review Online

(bulawreview),157,158-159,https://www.bu.edu/bulawreview/2021/12/30/law-and-culture.

Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, OxfordLearnersDictionaries.com, June 05, 2023.

Deflem, supra note. 253.

Ralf Michaels, Globalization and Law: Law Beyond the State, Law and Social Theory (Banakar & Travers eds.,

Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2013) 01, 09 (2013) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2240898.

Deflem, supra note. 255- 257.

Id. at 264.

Id. at 266.

Id. at 267.

Frank J. Garcia, Law and Globalization: Conceptual Issues, Paper 33/2016 TLI Think! 01, 10, (2016)

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2834299.

Michaels, supra note. 13.

Id. at 18.

Deflem, supra note. 227.

Id. at 227-28.

WILLIAM LITTLE & RON MCGIVERN, INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLOGY, (1 st Canadian Edition 2014),

Chapter 7- ‘Deviance, Crime and Social Control’.

Deflem, supra note. 232-33.

LITTLE & MCGIVERN, supra note.

Id. at Chapter 7.2 ‘Theoretical Perspectives on Deviance’.

Id.

Id.

Id. at 272-273.

Id. at 275.

Published

2024-06-24

How to Cite

Aishwarya. (2024). Interesectionality of Law and Sociology: A Comprehensive Research Endeavor. Journal of Constitutional Law and Jurisprudence, 7(2), 58–70. Retrieved from https://lawjournals.celnet.in/index.php/Jolj/article/view/1599