A Legal Examination of the International Court of Justice's 1994 Advisory Opinion About the Deployment of Nuclear Weapons

Authors

  • Fateme Ghaeminasab
  • Sajjad Ranjbar Dafchahi

Keywords:

nuclear weapon, international law, humanitarian law, International Court of Justice, advisory vote

Abstract

International law is developed in part by the International Court of Justice, a legal entity. One of the duties of the court that helps to be more effective in international law is to issue advisory opinions. The court stated in its advisory opinion that any use of force that is permissible under Article 51 of the UN Charter may be authorised. This implies that the use of nuclear weapons may also be justified by customary international law, provided that the standards for the need and proportionality of force are satisfied. The United Nations General Assembly asked the International Court to offer an advisory opinion on whether the use or threat of nuclear weapons is permitted under international law in resolution 49/75 K (1994). This request presented the Court with a unique opportunity. If the act in question (which no State has proposed) is completely illegal or always against the law (a stance that has gained some followers but has been rightfully dismissed by the majority of the Court), then a thorough analysis of those circumstances would be necessary to answer the query posed by the General Assembly. In this scientific effort, the legal dimensions of this consultative vote were investigated using analytical and library methods .

References

Charles Rousseau. The Law of Armed Conflicts, translated by Dr. Seyed Ali Hanjani. 1369, first volume.

Nader Saed. International Law and the Non-Proliferation System of Nuclear Weapons. Publications of Shahr Danesh Institute of Legal Studies and Research; 1970.

Rafiei Alavi, Seyed Ehsan. Comparative Review of the Judgment of the International Court of Justice Regarding the Use of Nuclear Weapons from the Perspective of the Teachings of Islam and International Humanitarian Law. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Islamic Human Rights Studies. Volume: 2, Issue: 5, Year: 2013

Albarzi Varki, Masoud. Criticism of the International Court of Justice's Advisory Theory on the Threat or Resort to Nuclear Weapons. International Legal Services Office of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2013; (31): 87–5.

Selimi Turkmani, Hojjat. Criminalization of the use of nuclear weapons in the framework of emerging human-centered international law. First Year Criminal Law Research Quarterly. 2013 Fall; Number 1.

Mojtaba Babaei. Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy in International Law with Emphasis on Iran’s Uranium Enrichment. The Judicial Legal Journal. Volume 79, Issue 92 - Serial Number 92, December 2016, Pages 33-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22106/jlj.2016.18908

Amir Dabeiri Mehr. Theories of International Relations. quoted from the website of Andisheh Club. [Online]. at http://bashgah.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=4615

Jack Mendelson. The Bush Presidency: Reconsidering the CTBT. Available from: http://www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd53/53ctbt.htm

Declaration of 1868 of St. Petersburg regarding the use of explosive bullets less than 400 grams during war.

Declaration Renouncing the Use, in Time of War, of Explosive Projectiles Under 400 Grammes Weight. Saint Petersburg, 29 November/11 December 1868 ;

Declaration of 1874 Brussels regarding the laws and customs of war, International declaration concerning the laws and customs of war. Russells, 27 August 1874 .

Convention with respect to the laws and customs of war on land (HAGUE, II) (29 July 1899);

The Fourth Hague Convention of 1907 regarding laws and customs of war on land (HAGUE, IV); October 18, 1907 .

The first additional protocol to the 1949 conventions; Protocol additional to the Geneva conventions of August 12, 1949, and relating to the protection of victims of international armed conflicts (protocol 1) Adopted on June 8, 1977 .

Charter of the United Nations; The charter of the united nations ;

The Treaty on the Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (known as the NPT Treaty). Treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, 1968 ;

Partial Test Ban Treaty of August 5, 1963, Partial Test Ban Treaty (PTBT). Formal Title: "Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and under Water ;

Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, September 24, 1996. Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), New York on, September 24, 1996 ;

Resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly under the numbers: 1378 (xiv) 20 November 1959; 1664 (xvi) December 4, 1961; 1652 (vvi) November 24, 1961; 1653 (xvi) November 24, 1961; 1577 (xv) 20 December 1960; 1578 (xv) 20 December 1960; 1576 (xv) 20 December 1960; 1380 November 20, 1959; A/RES/62/59, 5 Dec. 2007; A/RES/62/56, 5 Dec. 2007; A/RES/62/51, 5 Dec. 2007; A/RES/62/42, 5 Dec. 2007; A/RES/62/39, 5 Dec. 2007; A/RES/60/46, 8 Dec. 2005; A/RES/60/48, 8 Dec. 2005; A/RES/60/49, 8 Dec. 2005; A/RES/60/50, 8 Dec. 2005; A/RES/60/52, 8 Dec. 2005; A/RES/60/70, 8 Dec. 2005; A/RES/60/76, 8 Dec. 2005; A/RES/60/88, 8 Dec. 2005; A/RES/60/95, 8 Dec. 2005;

https://www.icj-cij.org/case/95

News sources such as: Khabar Online, A, Wikipedia and ...

Published

2023-12-21

How to Cite

Ghaeminasab, F. ., & Dafchahi, S. R. . (2023). A Legal Examination of the International Court of Justice’s 1994 Advisory Opinion About the Deployment of Nuclear Weapons. Journal of Constitutional Law and Jurisprudence, 7(1), 34–50. Retrieved from https://lawjournals.celnet.in/index.php/Jolj/article/view/1458

Issue

Section

Federalism and Constitutional Issues

Categories