Interpreting Ambedkar's Concept of "Constitutional Morality" Vis a Vis the Supreme Court's Jurisprudence on the Same

Authors

  • Maitreyee Dubey

Keywords:

Constitutional Morality, legislature, Honourable, interpreting, Apex Court

Abstract

The Constitution of India provides for division of power. The role of the legislature is to make laws, the role of the executive is to implement those laws and the role of the judiciary is to interpret the framed laws by the legislature. In recent times, Constitutional morality has become an important tool used for judicial activism frequently. This study will first analyse the interpretation given by Dr. Bhim Ram Ambedkar and thereafter, consequently the study will reflect on major landmark judgments which acted as constitutional moment in the history of the interpretation of constitutional morality. It will parallelly compare the meaning of the term by Dr. Ambedkar and Apex Court. In the very recent case of Suprio vs Union of India, the concept of Constitutional Morality was again discussed by the Honourable Supreme Court, by a Constitutional Bench. In the end, the study will conclude by interpreting the analysis of judgments and some suggestions to solve the problem as portrayed by the hypothesis.

References

https://www.drishtiias.com/to-the-points/Paper2/constitutional-morality.

Vineeth Krishna. November 1948: Ambedkar presents Draft Constitution, Indian Constitution-Making Shifts into High Gear. Centre for Law and Policy Research. 2020 Nov 7. <https://clpr.org.in/blog/november-1948-ambedkar-presents-draft-constitution-indian-constitution-making-shifts-into-high-gear/> assessed 22 June, 2023.

Dr. BR Ambedkar. The Constitution and the Constituent Assembly Debates. Constituent Assembly Debates. 1948 Nov 4. <https://www.constitutionofindia.net/debates/04-nov-1948/> assessed 22 June, 2023.

Sai Deepak J. Dr Ambedkar on constitutional morality. The Daily Guardian. 2020 Aug 14. <https://thedailyguardian.com/dr-ambedkar-on-constitutional-morality/> assessed 22 June, 2023.

Supra note 2.

Pratap Bhanu Mehta. What is constitutional morality? <https://www.india-seminar.com/2010/615/615_pratap_bhanu_mehta.htm> Accessed 20 June 2023.

Id.

Dr. BR Ambedkar. Lok Sabha Secretariat. The Constitution and the Constituent Assembly Debates. (Speech at The Constitution and the Constituent Assembly Debates, Delhi, 25 November 1949). <https://prasarbharati.gov.in/whatsnew/whatsnew_653363.pdf> accessed 22 June 2023.

Naz Foundation v. Government of NCT of Delhi. 111 DRJ 1 [DB]. 2009.

Supra 9n.

NALSA v. Union of India. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 400/2012. 2014.

Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India. 10 SCC 1. 2018.

Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation, Civil Appeal No. 10972 OF 2013.

Supra note 11.

State (NCT of Delhi) v. Union of India. 12 SCC 259. 2020.

Supra 9n.

KS Puttaswamy v. Union of India. 1 SCC 1. 2019.

Supra 17n.

Indian Young Lawyers Assn. (Sabrimala Temple) v. State of Kerela. SCC OnLine SC 1690 [SC]. 2018.

Indian Young Lawyers Assn. (Sabrimala Temple) v. State of Kerela. SCC OnLine SC 1690 [SC]. 2018.

Joseph Shine v. Union of India. 3 SCC 39. 2019.

Shayara Bano v. Union of India. 9 SCC 1. 2017.

Independent Thought v. Union of India. 10 SCC 800, 2017.

Independent Thought v. Union of India. 10 SCC 800, Para 91. 2017.

Supriyo v. Union of India. SCC OnLine SC 1348. 2023.

Supriyo v. Union of India. SCC OnLine SC 1348, Para 256. 2023.

Supriyo v. Union of India. SCC OnLine SC 1348, Para 372. 2023.

Published

2023-12-15

How to Cite

Dubey, M. (2023). Interpreting Ambedkar’s Concept of &quot;Constitutional Morality&quot; Vis a Vis the Supreme Court’s Jurisprudence on the Same. Journal of Constitutional Law and Jurisprudence, 7(1), 28–33. Retrieved from https://lawjournals.celnet.in/index.php/Jolj/article/view/1454