Deciphering the Nature of State under Article 12 of the Indian Constitution

Authors

  • Arya A. Kumar
  • Nihal J.K

Keywords:

Article 12, Autonomy, Legal-Framework, Individual-Right, Private-Entities.

Abstract

The nature of the State under Article 12 of the Indian Constitution is a subject of paramount importance in the realm of constitutional law. Article 12 defines the term “State” as it is used throughout the Constitution, and its interpretation has far-reaching implications for the fundamental rights and duties of Indian citizens. The complexities involved in deciphering the nature of the State within the context of Article 12. Article 12, as a cornerstone provision, serves as a bridge between the legal framework and the protection of individual liberties. The definition of the State, under this article, extends beyond the executive and legislative branches to include government instrumentalities and even entities significantly financed or controlled by the
government. This broad interpretation, while essential for safeguarding the fundamental rights of the citizens, has also raised questions about the extent of government reach and the potential for abuse of power. The historical evolution of Article 12, key judicial pronouncements, and the dynamic interplay between government bodies, public authorities, and private entities that fulfill public functions. It also explores the need for a balanced and nuanced approach to interpret the nature of the State, ensuring the protection of individual rights while preserving the autonomy of non-state entities. Understanding the evolving nature of the State under Article 12 is essential for shaping the course of constitutional jurisprudence and the protection of citizens fundamental rights in India.

References

Machiavelli, The Prince, Volume XXXVI, Part 1, Harvard Classics, P.F. Collier & Sons, (1909-1914)

Thomas Hobbes, LEVIATHAN, or the matter, forme and power of a commonwealth ecclesiastical and civil (1651).

Jean Bodin, Six Books of the Commonwealth (Les Six Livres de la République) (1576).

Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, Dec. 26, 1933, 165 L.N.T.S. 19 (1934).

Article 12, The Constitution of India, 1950

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, (1973) 4 SCC 225, para 193.

State of West Bengal v. The Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights, (2010) 3 SCC 571, para 38.

Pradeep Kumar Biswas v. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, (2002) 5 SCC 111, para 45 (India).

State of Karnataka v. Vishwabharathi House Building Co-op. Society, (2003) 2 SCC 412, para 9 (India).

P.D. Shamdasani vs Central Bank Of India Ltd,(1951) AIR 59

Ibid, Para 394

Shrimati Vidya Verma, Through v Dr. Shiv Narain Verma,(1956)SCR (2) 983.

Sukhdev Singh &Orsv.Bagatram Sardar Singh (1975) SCR (3) 619.

Marsh v. Alabama is 326 U.S. 501 (1946).

Supra note 17 at page 23.

People's Union For Democratic vs Union Of India & Others (1982)SCR (1) 456.

S. Rangarajan V/s P. Jagjivan Ram (1989)SCC (2) 574.

Supra note 22 para 588.

The Chairman, Railway Board &Orsv.Mrs. Chandrima Das&Ors(2000) 2 SCC 465.

M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath&Ors(1997) 1 SCC 388.

Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v.Union of India&Ors1996 5 SCC 647.

Enviro¬Legal Action v.Union of India1996 SCC 3 212.

Supra note 26 para 14.

Consumer Education & Research Centre &Ors. v. Union of India (1995) SCC (3) 42

Ibid para 31

Vishaka &Ors v State Of Rajasthan&Ors(1997) 6 SCC 241).

Medha Kotwal Lele&Ors. v. Union of India (2013) 1 SCC 312

ibid

Section 19 - Guardian not to be appointed by the Court in certain cases: Nothing in this Chapter shall authorize the Court to appoint or declare a guardian of the property of a minor whose property is under the superintendence of a Court of Wards, or to appoint or declare a guardian of the person - a) of a minor who is a married female and whose husband is not, in the opinion of the Court, unfit to be guardian of her person, or b) of a minor whose father is living and is not, in the opinion of the court, unfit to be guardian of the person of the minor, or c) of a minor whose property is under the superintendence of a Court of Ward competent to appoint a guardian of the person of the minor.

Ms. Githa Hariharan &Anrv. Reserve Bank Of India &Anr(1998) 2 SCC 228.

Indian Medical Association v.Union Of India&Ors(2011) 7 SCC 179.

T.M.A.Pai Foundation &Ors v. State Of Karnataka &Ors (2002) 8 SCC 481.

Supra note 37.

Ibid.

in Jeeja Ghosh v. Union of India (2016) 7 SCC 761.

Zee Telefilms Limited &Anr. v. Union of India &Ors. (2005) 4 SCC 649.

Janet Jeyapaulv.. SRM University and others 2015 (16) SCC 530.

Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. UOI (2017) 10 SCC 1 Ibid para 397

Ibid para 398

ibid

A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras,1950 SCR 88.

Kaushal Kishor v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others, 2023 SCC Online SC 6.

Ibid.

Published

2023-11-28

How to Cite

Kumar, A. A. ., & Nihal J.K. (2023). Deciphering the Nature of State under Article 12 of the Indian Constitution. Journal of Constitutional Law and Jurisprudence, 6(2), 151–160. Retrieved from https://lawjournals.celnet.in/index.php/Jolj/article/view/1438

Issue

Section

Federalism and Constitutional Issues

Categories